In the very, very simplest terms, judging the validity of an argument starts centers around this process:
1) Identify the rhetoric (Lines of Argument) from the actual, formal reasons. Separate the persuasive language from the actual claims to truth and fact.
2) Analyze those reasons (claims to truth and fact) by identifying their logic (often in the Implicit Reasons) and evidence.
3) Test and evaluate the logic and evidence; identify logical errors and ask whether the evidence can and has been tested and objectively, repeatedly, factually verified.
Two opposite ray <u>always</u> form a line.
Answer: He conveys that many different arguments can be presented against socialism.
Explanation: The rest don’t make sense, there is no process nor is it in order of importance. The next option says each point is a logical result of the previous one but each of the arguments don’t seem to connect to the previous.
The correct answer to this question is letter "B." The statement that <span>best illustrates a pair of sentences that are joined by an understood relationship is that </span><span><em>It rained for ten days and ten nights. Grandmother Grady called a company to drill a well.</em></span>
