Question

“In Xanadu did Kubla Khan, a stately pleasure dome decree.” These words are as immortal and indeed as famed as any by Shakespeare, and yet they introduce a far stranger work than even The Tempest, perhaps the oddest of all the Bard’s plays. The lines are the first of “Kubla Khan,” by the English poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge, one of the most beloved works of the Romantic period. But for a poem so revered, its meaning is surprisingly ambiguous.
The poem has two main parts, with the first describing the dome the Mongol Kubla Khan constructed on the banks of the River Alph. Said dome is destroyed toward the end of the first section, and, in the second, the narrator recounts an Abyssinian maid he once saw. The maid was capable of inspiring him and giving him godlike powers. Indeed, at the end of the poem, the speaker imagines others fearing his “flashing eyes” and “floating hair.” As might be apparent from the summary of the two disjointed sections, making sense of the poem’s two parts is not an easy task.

Contemporary critics have suggested “Kubla Khan” is a poem about the creation of poetry, but only the second half of the poem seems to support this. Others have argued it is a poem about the destructive forces of nature, but only the first half of the poem seems to support that reading. Still others have suggested the poem is about the contrasting idylls and terrors of the dream world, arguing that the poem suggests man is capable of both creating personal utopias and personal hells. While this author tends to support that last analysis, there are aspects of the poem that still leave her scratching her head and wondering just what in the heck Coleridge was trying to say. As one contemporary of Coleridge’s put it, Coleridge was the best writer of “nonsense verse” in the English language, and it is often hard to separate nonsense from necessary phrases when determining the abstract meaning (or perhaps meanings!) of the poem.

Regardless of its meaning, the poem endures because of the power it contains. A reader of the poem cannot help but get lost in the figurative language of the poem and the robust force the poem uses to create its image. It is a masterwork by a master of language, and to read it is to gain a better appreciation for the powers of language. As such, perhaps the meaning of the poem does not really matter, for the meaning of the poem might simply come from the experience of reading it and getting lost in the dream it creates.

The author of the passage most likely believes that

A poets often lie about their inspirations

B all poems have just one intended meaning

C Shakespeare could not have written something like “Kubla Khan”

D most popular poems are easy to understand

E Coleridge did not really dream up “Kubla Khan”

Answer 1

C is the correct answer!