This argument is based on "the linguistic relativity hypothesis".
The hypothesis of linguistic relativity holds that the structure of a dialect influences its speakers' reality view or discernment. Prevalently known as the Sapir– Whorf theory, or Whorfianism, the standard is regularly characterized to incorporate two forms. The solid form says that dialect decides thought and that etymological classifications confine and decide intellectual classifications, while the feeble adaptation says that phonetic classifications and use just impact thought and choices.
It should be B, but I’m not too educated on Egypt’s history
Answer:
Third, the crusading movement impacted internal European development in a few important ways. The movement helped both to militarize the medieval western Church and to sustain criticism of that militarization. It arguably helped solidify the pope’s control over the Church and made certain financial innovations central to Church operations. And it both reflected and influenced devotional trends. For example, while there was some dedication to St. George from the early Middle Ages, the intensity of that devotion soared in Europe after he reportedly intervened miraculously at the Battle of Antioch in 1098, during the First Crusade.
Answer:
widespread ethnic conflict, lack of national identity
Explanation:
A lot of effect can be derived from the Europeans creation of colonial boundaries. Because the boundaries were artificially made, they by and large do not conform to “typical demographic, topographic and ethnographic boundaries.” Instead, they were created by colonialists who saw the act as a means to advance their political goals.
This metamorphosed into large scale issues, like the separation of ethnic groups; and other small scale issues, like families’ homes being alienated from their farms.
