1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
3 years ago
9

What is won comparison between the Incas and Aztecs

English
1 answer:
Tanzania [10]3 years ago
5 0
The Incas had a technologically advanced frame of mind while the Aztecs believed in sacrifice of humans. Both the Incas and Aztecs believed in and worshipped the sun god.
You might be interested in
Help plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
topjm [15]

Answer: yes, no, no

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is Ernesto Galarza's purpose for writing Barrio Boy?
True [87]

Answer:

B, I read the prompt

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Fill in the blank:
S_A_V [24]
spondee is the answer. 

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does a first-person narrator differ from a third-person narrator? Select all that apply.
UNO [17]

Answer:

Definitely the first one, probably the second and third as well?

Explanation:

A first-person narrator is usually recounting an event, so they definitely use 'I'.

A third-person narrator sometimes knows the thoughts of other characters, depending on whether they're omniscient or not.

A first-person narrator is likely to show bias I think, because they're telling the story from their point of view so they're very likely to share their opinions and stuff. I don't really know, you're gonna kinda have to decide on this one.

A third-person narrator sometimes takes part? I mean, if they're third-person limited then usually it's the POV of a character but from a more detached persona? For example, in the Heroes of Olympus series all the chapters are in third person limited but all the characters take part in the action. If it's third-person omniscient then I don't think they'd be taking part in the action, unless the narrator is like a dude from the future recounting events that happened to his younger self and all that stuff. I don't really know, man.

8 0
3 years ago
Is canceling someone the appropriate way to hold people accountable for what they say?​
KIM [24]

Answer:

This question is all up to opinion and in my opinion, cancel culture and canceling someone isn't the proper way to hold people accountable for what they say. In the United States Sixth Amendment, it guarantees the right to a fair trial and innocent until proven guilty. With cancel culture, it skips and removes this right causing a public figure's life to be ruined just by public opinion.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select the correct answer
    15·1 answer
  • If you interject your opinion into a conversation your friends are having, you:
    15·2 answers
  • How does the line “Black snake! Black snake!” contribute to the structure of the poem "The Black Snake"?
    7·1 answer
  • What is included in a strong paragraph? a. one main idea in a thesis sentence.b. one main idea in a topic sentence.c. a series o
    10·1 answer
  • What's the definition of languished as it's used in the "I Have a Dream" speech? A. Being forced to remain in an undesirable pla
    6·1 answer
  • The kite runner where do you see the kite symbol
    13·1 answer
  • Someone PLEASE fill this out for me it’s due tomorrow and i need help!
    13·1 answer
  • I would rather spend my vacation in the big city then​
    9·1 answer
  • Prompt Write an argumentative essay for or against viewing sports figures and celebrities as positive role models.
    6·2 answers
  • In paragraphs 4 and 5, the author compares sea stars with missing limbs to humans with missing limbs to emphasize her point that
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!