The Zhou army relied on military to fight the Shang given that the Chang were fighting back.
<h3>Why did the Zhou people fight the Chang dynasty?</h3>
This was in order to topple and take over the government that was existing at the time.
Military Invaders fought the Shang in the capital city. The Zhou army defeated the defending army and they took over the leadership.
Read more on the Zhou dynasty here: brainly.com/question/777857
In the piramids
They were a tombs
Becuase hittler was beat at world war 2 so he lost control over germany
Answer: I gotchu
Explanation: 1. The North had Britain and the French on there side
2. The North had an enormous industrial advantage
3. Nearly 21 million people lived in 23 Northern states. The South claimed just 9 million people — including 3.5 million slaves
4. Since the North controlled the navy, the seas were in the hands of the Union.
5. The North had twice the density of railroads per square mile
6. The North had loads more factories to make supplies for the Union army
7. The North had many non slave people to grow food and work in factories
8. This one is kinda obvious but the North won the war.
Answer:
I hope it helps u.
Explanation:
Arms races have generated a great deal of interest for a variety of reasons. They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations. The opposing view holds that engaging in an arms race is often a state's best option for avoiding war when faced with an aggressive adversary. Debate over the causes of arms races is just as divided. One school believes that arms races are primarily rational responses to external threats and opportunities, whereas arms race skeptics believe that arms buildups are usually the product of a mixture of internal, domestic interests, including those of the scientists involved in research and development (R&D), the major producers of weapons systems, and the military services that will operate them. The policy implications of these contending views are equally contradictory; critics see arms control as a way to reduce the probability of war and rein in domestic interests that are distorting the state's security policy, and proponents argue that military competition is most likely to protect the state's international interests and preserve peace.
Arms buildups and arms races also play a prominent role in international relations (IR) theory. Building up arms is one of a state's three basic options for acquiring the military capabilities it requires to achieve its international goals; the other two are gaining allies and cooperating with its adversary to reduce threats. In broad terms, choosing between more competitive and more cooperative combinations of these options is among the most basic decisions a state must make, and it is often the most important.
Mark me as brainlist answer,
Have a nice day,
Thank you ☺
