The event that is most likely is Aylmer's love for his wife and for science conflict.
Explanation:
Aylmer is a scientist who believes in the natural philosophy as well as loves his wife, Georgia dearly. However, Georgia has a birthmark on her face which stands as a barrier to her beauty and Aylmer feels uncomfortable with it though he really loves her. He believes with the help of science he can remove the mark. However, Georgia is not really fine with it in the beginning.
The event that is most likely is Aylmer's love for his wife and for science conflict. Yet, Georgia insists Aylmer to take away the mark even if she dies, and Aylmer believes that taking away the mark will not do anything to her. However, she dies in the end.
Answer:
- Point out that he has just experienced hindsight bias, a concept discovered by social psychologists.
Explanation:
As per the given description, the most appropriate response to the roommate would be 'pointing out that he has experienced hindsight bias.' The concept 'hindsight bias' has recently been discovered by the social psychologists in which an individual displays a tendency to perceive events as more predictable than they actually are. This similar tendency is being displayed by the roommate when he asserts that 'he could have predicted the finding even before hearing about it' which needs to be pointed out as it might lead to creating distortions in his memory.
Answer:
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Explanation:
Answer:
c. Deductive, analogy
Explanation:
In this scenario, the argument being made would be classified as a deductive analogy. An analogy basically compares two things together in order to explain an idea, most of the time these two things have something in common that allows that idea to be better understood. In this scenario, they are comparing a rabid dog and an unexploded bomb. Since the unexploded bomb is the object that the rabid dog is being compared to it would be considered the conclusion, and since the conclusion is being applied first in the second part of the argument you are therefore using deductive logic.
Answer:
They're in the daylight hours, the temperature reached 840 degrees.
Explanation:
