The Civil War was by far the most catastrophic event to ever happen in the American South. There have been at least a few discussions on whether Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans should have prosecuted the Civil War, but surprisingly very little analysis on whether South Carolina's secession in 1860 was a strategically wise move in the context of the American debate on slavery and states' rights.
Secession was driven by the Southern planter class. For the purposes of this article, let's stipulate that the preservation of slavery and the plantation economy was the primary objective in seceding from the United States. If that was the point of secession, then the strategy was an obvious disaster
Answer:
The famous Wade-Davis bill opposed the "10 percent plan" of Lincon. The Wade–Davis Bill (1864) was proposed to reconstruct the South. In contrast to the Ten Percent Plan, the bill ensured the re-admittance to Union on majority in every Southern state for taking the oath.
Explanation:
Answer:
the compromise of 1850 was passed, hope this helps
Explanation:
Answer:
I wrote a really thorough explanation but It got deleted because "it was inappropriate" I guess they just want a watered-down version but Im not give you that so here:
PS: if you want sources ask and you shall receive. goodluck! (:
Answer:
No, he did not
Explanation:
He shouldve let them have some representation with the goverment to try to negotiate.
