1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bekas [8.4K]
3 years ago
11

PLEASE HURRY!!!!!!

History
2 answers:
Marysya12 [62]3 years ago
6 0

A.

by creating and developing modern American Indian art

Fantom [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

D

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why do exotic dancers make more money than teachers​
yanalaym [24]

Answer:

Because sexuality sells more than teaching does

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the aftermath of World War I, the Allied powers came together to design a peace treaty. Though they worked together to defeat
Finger [1]

Answer:

Britain, France and the United States all disagreed on on the issue of reparations settlement. It leads to the War Guilt Clause, or Article 231, of the Treaty of Versailles.

Explanation:

France required Germany to pay reparations for the damage they had caused, as a means to ensure that Germany could not again threaten France and as well to weaken the German ability to compete with France's industrialization.

Britain opposed harsh reparations in favor of a lighter reparations settlement, including war pensions for disabled veterans and allowances to be paid to war widows.

The United States, on the other hand, opposed these settlements, and requested that there be no indemnity imposed upon Germany.

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement describes how governments deal with scarcity?
PilotLPTM [1.2K]
By definition, the word "scarcity" is an economic problem which mainly revolves around on the idea that the limited resources a state has are not sufficient in providing the needs of the people. In addition, one of the measures done by the government to address this problem would be to by "<span>choosing options that best match supply with demand."</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Grant’s policy to win the war was one of <br> what
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

Grant's policy to win the war was one of <em>attrition</em>.

Attrition is a gradual reduction in work force without firing personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced. Or in other words, it is a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength (can be used in <em>"ACW"</em> terms)

<h2>What was General Ulysses S. Grant's strategy to win the war? (American Civil War)</h2>

It's critical to keep in mind that Grant wasn't solely responsible for the overall plan he employed during the war's final year. Lincoln urged that Confederate forces be struck and that Confederate cities and logistics be disregarded in favor of striking the enemy where he was, as described in James McPherson's book Tried by War. Lincoln's insistence on this at the expense of actions that would have had a larger immediate impact on the Confederate ability to prolong the war contributed in part to the "butcher" label placed on Grant. Grant would have sent half of the Army of the Potomac below the James River in order to push on Petersburg in May 1864, which would have certainly resulted in a shorter conflict and far fewer losses. Grant had the most crystal-clear vision of everyone as to how the Union could and should win the war: deny the Confederacy the resources necessary for it to wage war. Making the Anaconda Plan work first and foremost means seizing control of all significant Confederate harbors in order to prevent the supply of weapons and equipment from Europe. (In his narrative, he frequently laments how he was unable to carry out the attack on Mobile that he had planned, first because to Banks' Red River campaign and subsequently as a result of the sluggish and uncooperative generals on the ground.)

As a department commander in the Mississippi Valley, Grant's largest grievance, incidentally, was with licensed trade that occurred between the Union and Confederacy. Lincoln's government actually let traders to cross the lines and buy cotton using gold coin, which the Confederates would employ to transport drugs and other contraband from the Union. This was because the North was in such dire need of raw cotton. Grant thought that the commerce had bolstered the rebellion while weakening Union war resolve by fostering corruption. (And he felt a great deal of personal humiliation about the whole situation because his own father was heavily involved in the cross-border commerce.) Grant supported stealing or destroying indigenous Southern industries in addition to blocking Confederate trade overseas. As a result, the main Confederate cities—New Orleans, Richmond, Nashville, and Charleston—were captured and held while lesser towns were destroyed. This naturally included agriculture, which is why he specifically instructed Sheridan to remove all livestock from the Shenandoah and why he authorized Sherman's march into Georgia. Finally, Grant thought that steady pressure from all Union troops acting together would be the best way to achieve this on all fronts. By 1863, Grant realized that the Confederacy's greatest strength was their ability to shift troops from one dangerous location to another because Union forces kept starting and stopping without applying constant pressure to the enemy. Grant was well aware of the manpower and logistical limitations of the Confederacy. He thought that by applying continued pressure to the rebel troops, they would be forced to retreat or capitulate in the face of considerably superior forces. Grant's initiatives, as we all know, had a mixed record of success and were not completely implemented. Lincoln and Stanton (especially Stanton) interfered quite a bit. Grant's feeling of urgency for quick action was not shared by the majority of other Union generals, allowing the Confederacy to continue temporarily moving forces to fulfill demands. However, when massive casualty lists failed to do so, it was the conquest of Confederate ports, the obliteration of Confederate industry and agriculture, and the ensuing collapse of the southern economy that eventually shattered the rebel will to fight. In that regard, Grant's plan was the best one—and it worked.

Learn more about Ulysses Grant:

brainly.com/question/21942516

brainly.com/question/12468430

4 0
1 year ago
The legend not investigated in North America was: Fountain of Youth Inca gold rich Indian tribes golden houses
IRINA_888 [86]
The Incas were an empire located in modern day <span>Peru. All the other choices were investigated in North America. Therefore, inca gold is your answer!

</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why is freedom of speech limited in the United States?
    7·3 answers
  • What should happen to an escaped slave according to the constitution?
    11·1 answer
  • What motivated the Romans to develop innovations in sanitation<br>​
    6·2 answers
  • What is one way to get involved at the state level of government?​
    7·1 answer
  • Why did technology make it difficult for armies on the western front to mount successful offensive attack ?
    8·1 answer
  • How did geography influence the early economic development of New York,Boston,and Charleston
    13·1 answer
  • What is a person born in another country but comes to live in the U.S.
    10·1 answer
  • Colombia está dividida en entidades territoriales de diferentes niveles. estas entidades son de niveles superiores e inferiores.
    7·1 answer
  • Why Was The Ottoman Empire A Desirable Territory...
    13·1 answer
  • What land was included in the lousiana purchase ​
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!