Answer:
#lma.obye #sh_tty #LOVEISCRAP
Explanation:
Answer:
No, because evidence of the beliefs or opinions of a witness on matters of religion is not admissible to impair credibility.
Explanation:
In this context, credibility is only attained by an oath sworn with lawfully certified objects or items representing the religious beliefs of the state and not necessarily the genuine or validity of the witness declaration with such religious object to swore against the declaration of truth in the court of law.
First add the whole numbers.
Then find the LCM (least common multiple) of 3 and 2, which are the denominators of both fractions. In this case, the LCM of 3 and 2 are 6.
As you can see in the photo, I multiplied a number than can result in 6 in both denominators. Then multiply that same number to the numerators.
Finally, add 21+2, but keep the denominator as 6.
This is how I learned it, hope it helps.
The correct answer is one main clause.
This means that there is only one verb in the sentence, which in this case is the verb 'was.' Even though drive is also a verb, in this context it is used as an adjective driven (participle form of the verb to drive) and is thus not considered to be a verb. This means that there are no subordinate clauses but rather just one main clause.