Answer:
sec(theta°)cos(theta°) = 1
Step-by-step explanation:
given data
(theta°) = 225
to find out
sec(theta°)cos(theta°)
solution
as we know that given equation
(theta°) = 225
cos(theta°) will be
cos(225°) = -0.7071 .................................1
so we know
sec(theta°) =
..............2
so put here value of cos(theta°)
sec(theta°) =
sec(theta°) = - 1.4142
so
sec(theta°)cos(theta°) = -0.7071 × ( - 1.4142 )
sec(theta°)cos(theta°) = 1
so answer is sec(theta°)cos(theta°) = 1
Answer:
oh my! not sure what y’all are learnin, but i’m guessing its 0, 1 makes no sense nor does any of the 3’s. i would consider asking a teacher ;-;
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Yes, there is enough evidence to say the proportions are the same.
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: The proportions are the same.
Alternate hypothesis: The proportions are not the same.
Data given:
p1 = 51% = 0.51
n1 = 200
p2 = 48% = 0.48
n2 = 150
pooled proportion (p) = (n1p1 + n2p2) ÷ (n1 + n2) = (200×0.51 + 150×0.48) ÷ (200 + 150) = 174 ÷ 350 = 0.497
Test statistic (z) = (p1 - p2) ÷ sqrt[p(1-p)(1/n1 + 1/n2) = (0.51 - 0.48) ÷ sqrt[0.497(1-0.497)(1/200 + 1/150)] = 0.03 ÷ 0.054 = 0.556
The test is a two-tailed test. At 0.10 significance level the critical values -1.645 and 1.645
Conclusion:
Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the test statistic 0.556 falls within the region bounded by the critical values.
First let's make the denominators equal, so that we can compare the two fractions more easily.
To do this, we have to find a number that both 15 and 9 divide into. The smallest number that this can happen to is 45.
15 x 3 = 45
9 x 5 = 45
So we have to multiply 15 by 3 in order to make it into 45. If we're changing the denominator, the numerator must change too, by the same multiplier.
4 ---> 4 x 3 = 12
--
15 ---> 15 x 3 = 45
4/15 = 12/45
5 ---> 5 x 5 = 25
--
9 ---> 9 x 5 = 45
5/9 = 25/45
To find how many times more rings there are, we divide 25 by 12. As the result of this isn't an integer, we leave the answer as a fraction:
There rings inventory is 25/12 times bigger than the earrings inventory.
If Mike is willing to pay no more than an effective rate of 8.000% annually, the loans that meet his criteria are loan X and loan Z. Of those two, the lowest would be loan X. I hope the answer will help you :)