Answer:
Ending inventory= $5,592.45
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Mar. 1: Beginning inventory= 1,090 units at $7.25
Mar. 10: Purchase: 510 units at $7.75
Mar. 16: Purchase: 397 units at $8.35
Mar. 23: Purchase: 510 units at $9.05
First, we need to calculate the number of units in ending inventory:
Ending inventory in units= total units - units sold
Ending inventory in units= 2,507 - 1,880= 627
Under FIFO (first-in, first-out), the ending inventory is composed of the cost of the last units bought.
Ending inventory= 510*9.05 + 117*8.35= $5,592.45
Answer:
The value of the intangible will remain at $350,000
Explanation:
The reason is that the International Accounting Standard IAS-36 says that once the impairment is recognized for the intangible assets it can not be reversed which means that the amount reported would be $350,000. The reason is that it is very rare that the asset gain its value and specially those which are intangible assets. Most of the management in the 1990s-2000 tried to recognize a gain on impairment which was unjustifiable to increase their profits for the period so the standard specifically didn't permitted gain on a previously impaired asset.
In this item, since the purchase has been made and that it was due to the agreement that that said amount is paid rather than a smaller one, the element that should be taken to the journal should be $1.7 in cash out column. The money is used to pay the liability. In this manner, the corporation will not have the need to physical call on someone to explain when the numbers in the journal do not match.
<span>In order to compute the gestational age of their
fetus by determining the time of last menstrual period. Gestational age is also
called the menstrual age which measures the age of the fetus. Gestational age
is usually being computed by the date of the last menstrual period of the
mother and by doing an obstetric ultrasound to verify the size of the fetus and
thru this it can estimate the gestation age of the fetus. </span>
Economic analysis suggests that countercyclical macro-policy will c. reduce the natural rate of unemployment when macro-policy is persistently expansionary.
<h3>What is Counter-cyclical fiscal policy?</h3>
Counter-cyclical fiscal policy can be regarded as the policy that government usually used to go against the direction of the economic or business cycle.
Therefore, reduce the natural rate of unemployment when macro-policy is persistently expansionary.
Read more on human capita development here:
brainly.com/question/6583917
#SPJ12