<span>If local shell gasoline stations look at bp stations' prices as the primary method of determining its own prices, shell is using</span> competition-based pricing.
In this we considers costs have not much value and consider to be less important than competitor's prices, means competitor's price is important.
Answer:
$36,000 and $30,000
Explanation:
Corrugated company deals in the production of cardboard boxes
The expected production for each month is 40,000 units
The direct material cost is $0.30 per unit
The manufacturing fixed overhead costs are $24,000 for each month
Therefore, the flexible budget for the production of 40,000 units and 20,000 units can be calculated as follows
Flexible budget for 40,000 units
= 0.30×40,000+24,000
= 12,000+24,000
= $36,000
Flexible budget for 20,000 units
= 0.30×20,000+24,000
= 6,000+24,000
= $30,000
Hence the flexible budget for 40,000 units and 20,000 units are $36,000 and $30,000 respectively
Answer:
The answer is $4.27
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
AC corporation earns = $9.2 per share
Pays a dividend of =$4.00
The tax rate (Corporate ) is =39%
The tax rate on personal dividends is= 15%
The tax rate for non-dividend personal income is = 36%
Now,
We must find the after tax rate amount of after tax rate an individual or a person would earn from the dividend
Thus,
The corporate tax =$9.40 * 39% = 3.67
Personal tax = $4.00 * 15% = 0.6
Now we find the total for the after tax rate
Total = $3.67 + $0.6
= $4.27
Therefore, the after tax rate an individual or a person would earn from the said divided is $4.27
Answer:
The answer is 0.4
Explanation:
The formula for total debt ratio is total debt ÷ total assets.
Total debt equals current debt plus total long-term debt.
To find total debt(liability), remember Asset = Liability + Equity.
Therefore, Liability (debt) will be Asset - equity
$1,123,900 - $679,400
Total debt(liability) = $444,500
So, total debt ratio will be:
$444,500/$1,123,900
=0.4
This ratio means 0.4 or 40 percent of the company asset is financed by debt.
Answer:
There are advantages and disadvantages to both recruitment methods. Traditional recruitment is still the most common method of recruitment used in the world, due to its simplicity and greater speed in attracting candidates through advertisements, references and internal hiring, for example, which consequently speeds up the selection process, but this type of recruitment can lead to biased evaluations of candidates and not hiring employees based on some kind of prejudice.
In blind recruitment, however, it is not possible to identify details of curriculum and candidates, the selection is made through factors such as experience and skills of the candidate, which eliminates associated prejudices such as age, gender and ethnicity. But the disadvantage of blind recruitment is that it can reduce organizational diversity and miss details that align the candidate's values to organizational culture.
Therefore, it is necessary for each company to analyze which recruitment methods will be more advantageous according to the position, with traditional recruitment being more relevant for hiring professionals for higher hierarchical positions, where there is a need for a more in-depth analysis.
