Andrew Johnson - 17th presidente; fought radical republicans in congress over key reconstruction legislation.
Answer:
Margret L. King's article made arguments about how the men during the Renaissance thought women should not rule and many women did not rule with complete power. Men during the Renaissance spoke of how terrible a female ruler would be and how it was an act against nature. Few women did rule though and guided reform like Isabella daughter of Catherine of Aragon. Women began to try to make a change and bring women more power. Many women in power dismissed the idea of sexes and did not let their gender hold them back from power.
Joan Kelly-Godal's article describes the lady of the court as demure and almost as an object for the courtier. The woman is described mostly as being used for the mans image and his needs. She was only there for him and did not mean much and did not have power to anything. Her job was to charm and stay pretty for her husband.
These articles differ very much. The first article describes women as trying to gain power and trying to change rules and people's views. The second article is describing the lady of the court as demure and merely there for the mans sake. Both articles point out men's constraints on women during the Renaissance and how not everyone agreed with women gaining more power.
Explanation:
Feared a government with unlimited power
The first amendment gives people the freedom of speech, press, religion, and right to petition.
The second amendment gives people the right to own guns.
Theses are just the first two amendments, let me know if you need help with ten all of them :)
You have to paraphrase:
I find that the first selfish thing the British did was in the early 1760's, when they imposed taxes on the colonists without their consent. The colonists then ordered no taxation without representation. I chose this as my first complaint because the colonists had to use their own money to pay for the British governments debt for The French and Indian war.
In my opinion the third most important complaint was "He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures." This means that when the war was in a time of peace the colonists inferred that the British troops were going back to Britain. They didn't though, lots of troops stayed in America. In fact most stayed at the colonists' houses for free.
The lowest ranked out of the 5 complaints to me was when the British cut off trade with all parts of the world. England only allowed the colonies to trade with them. They clearly did not want to trade with just the British. Therefore they had to improvised by making their own clothes, tools, growing their own food etc. There was a bright side of this complaint though. The colonies became reliant on each other, which brought them closer together.
Another unjustified thing the British did was depriving them in many cases, of the benefit of trial by juries. For example during the sugar act colonists smuggled goods that had taxes on them (so that they didn't have to pay). Well the British obviously didn't like that. So instead of colonists having their own trial the British just arrested them. They didn't give the people a chance to prove if they were innocent or not.
