Answer:
Yes. Southam's research was "more wrong"
Explanation:
They both didn't seek the informed consent of their patients and we're both wrong. However, Southam injected patients(both healthy and unhealthy) with cancerous cells to see how their bodies would react. This was terribly wrong seeing that he put unsuspecting patients in danger. Elsie on the other hand, collected tissue samples from his patients to conduct his research which is a clear violation of their rights but clearly not as deadly as Southam's.
There are many influences that could potentially lead a member of the House of Representatives to vote against the wishes of the people in their district. Simply the member could think that their constituents are incorrect in their view or don't possess enough information so therefore, they decide not to vote in accordance with the views of their constituents. Another influence could be that of their political party or the elites in their party that wish for the member to vote a certain a way. Another influence could be special interest groups or lobbies that seek to sway the views of Congress Members. These are all factors that together or separately could make a member of Congress vote in opposition of their constituents views.
NO, it will not because if it does then the government will not pay the security
Answer:
No. The Erie Canal helped many cities such as New York with many things. It very much improved their economy and even led them to Industrialization.
Hope this helps, please mark as brainliest :P
Explanation:
Answer:
O melhor é colocar no AVA só o link
Explanation:
Segundo o suporte da Google (vide anexo 1).
Entretanto o tempo p upload pode ser longo pois é inversamente proporcional à velocidade da sua banda larga p tal.
