1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
igor_vitrenko [27]
3 years ago
15

How are procedures at appeals courts different from those at trial courts?

History
2 answers:
Katyanochek1 [597]3 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

In appellate courts, the lawyers simply argue legal and policy issues before the judge or a group of judges. In the trial courts, the lawyers present evidence and legal arguments to persuade the jury in a jury trial or the judge in a bench trial. The second difference between the two courts is the number of judges.

MAVERICK [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Appellate courts focus on questions of law, NOT on questions of facts like the trial courts. The appellate judges want to know whether the law was applied accurately. The appellate court overrules a trial court decision only if a very important legal error was made in the trial court.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Read the excerpt from "The Yellow Wallpaper." He said that after the wall-paper was changed it would be the heavy bedstead, and
kap26 [50]

Answer:

C (He believes that his wife is overreacting to the wallpaper.)

Explanation:

Correct on edge unit test review.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the Indians have to give to the land owners​
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:Money

Gold

Crops

Land

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How did imperialism change between 1600 and 1900? Is there a correlation between the size of an empire and the amount of power i
vaieri [72.5K]

In the 1600's Imperialism was based around colonization in the Americas and establishing trade in the east.  During this period the Americas were being colonized intensely by the Europeans that were racing to gain as much land and prestige as possible.  In the east, however, the main goal was to reach the Spice Islands (modern day Indonesia) and establish trade routes for the spices the Europeans desperately craved. Comparatively, in the 1900's Imperialism consisted of taking up land in places such as India, Africa, and Southeast Asia.  This was done in a "mission to civilize" meaning it was less about economics and now a more political and racial element were used to justify European conquest.

Hope this helps M8


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Need help with one more question!
emmainna [20.7K]

Answer:

1- Darius I, King of Persia, decided he wanted to conquer the Greeks in 490 BC. He gathered a vast army of soldiers that outnumbered any army the Greeks could muster.

2- The containment of communism.

6 0
3 years ago
The League of Nations’ goals included repatriation of thousands of people. Why did these people require repatriation?
pychu [463]
C. They had lost land during border disputes after World War I.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Match the following items.
    5·1 answer
  • 1. List at least 3 failures of the Articles of Confederation.
    6·1 answer
  • What group supported political machines
    15·2 answers
  • What is the longest river in Europe?
    8·1 answer
  • Who was Hammurabi, and what was his main goal?
    11·2 answers
  • How did the<br> development of state constitutions influence the<br> national plan for government?
    8·2 answers
  • TRUE/FALSE: Europeans conquered Africa before any other part of the
    11·1 answer
  • How has European culture surpassed african culture
    5·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the reconstruction amendment?
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPPPP
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!