The three artists present the Spanish civil war as something uncomfortable, but that has to be faced and observed by humanity. However, each artist represents this differently.
In Pablo Picasso's painting, you can see:
- The artist decided to portray the chaos in a city after a bombing.
- He was inspired by the bombing of the city of Guernica.
- The artist used monochromatic colors, simulating the color of the wreckage and simulating the colors of a photograph in newspapers at the time.
- The attista decided to show the military power of a war, while portraying people suffering and Spanish symbols amidst the wreckage.
In the painting by David Alfaro Siqueiros, it is possible to see:
- The artist focuses on the misery caused by war.
- He highlights the existence of orphaned children without any conditions of survival.
- He shows how war is capable of creating countless miserable and invalid people.
- He highlights how these people live in unending suffering.
In Salvador Dali's painting, it is possible to see:
- He shows how war causes the self-destruction of a nation, in this case Spain.
- He emphasizes this through a gigantic creature destroying itself high.
- He shows how destruction, death and starvation are the only things that stand out in a war.
- It reinforces the feeling of agony and loss.
With this, we can conclude that art is directly related to the events that happen in the world, allowing artists to express their feelings and provoke reflections, even if these reflections are too cruel.
You can find more information about the Spanish Civil War at the link below:
brainly.com/question/22939618?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
I think it's the second one
Answer:
As one of the principles of art, proportion refers to how parts of an artistic composition, whether it's a human figure or a face, or other objects that make up the subject matter, relate to each other in size, referring to its dimensions.
Explanation:
I did a huge art project a few years ago and had to do an reflection and state this in it after taking art notes
Hope this helps
It would it be inappropriate as a Critical thinker to use metaphorical sentences in certain contexts because it will confuse the audience with the implied comparison for instance, classroom was a zoo might be confusing to understand.
<h3>Why can the use
metaphorical sentences confuse the audience?</h3>
The use metaphorical sentences can confuse the audience because the metaphorical description usually make use of an implied comparison, instead of literal comparison.
As a Critical Thinker, one canuse assessment of reasons to evaluate statements as well as assumptions in ordinary situations, it will be more confusing in getting the point by ordinary audience.
And as a thinker, you need to consider the understand of the audience, because communication can only be effective when the receiver is able to get the the message.
And if metaphorical sentences are been used, the receiver of the message can misinterpret the message, which is not good for an effective communication.
Learn more about metaphor on:
brainly.com/question/7954582
#SPJ1
