The answer is: D - Both A and C.
The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?
Answer:
i would say i love you to them and i want a biggest hug and kiss on a cheek
Explanation:
Answer:
3 times
Explanation:
When the dough is folded, it increases by a constant factor. We can model the growth of the thickness using the exponential growth model
Where:
Initial thickness, 
= 2mm
Growth factor, r =8%=0.08
We want to find the smallest number of times Soon Yi will have to roll and fold the dough so that the resulting dough is at least 2.5mm.
i.e When 
Therefore, the smallest number of times Soon Yi will have to roll and fold the dough so that the resulting dough is at least 2.5mm thick is 3.
Answer:
The cost of production and using more efficient resources
