1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
omeli [17]
3 years ago
11

PLS jak najszybciej daje naj

English
1 answer:
Anna11 [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1.hasn't

2.did

3.seen

4.travel this

Hope this helps<u>;</u><u>have</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>great</u><u> </u><u>day</u><u>!</u><u> </u>

<u>Don't</u><u> </u><u>forget to</u><u> </u><u>follow</u><u> </u><u>up</u>

You might be interested in
Compare and contrast biblical creationists and evolutionists worldviews.
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

The beginning of the earth, along with the birth of humans is one of the biggest and most contentious issues among creationists and evolutionists. Scientific theory holds the opinion that the universe is eternal, while the Bible states that there is a beginning. It has been proven that there was an official beginning; the question that arises is when that exact beginning took place, a time where there was neither time nor space nor matter. Christianity uses the Old Testament to describe the beginning of life. In the span of six days, God created the heavens, the earth, the sun, moon, water, animals, and ended with the finalé of human beings. Other major events such as Noah’s flood occurred along the lifespan of the earth, accounting for the distribution of fossils and the formation of the earth’s layers Evolution is defined as “the development by natural causes of all organisms, those today and those yesterday, from other forms probably ultimately much simpler and originally perhaps from non-living substances. According to evolutionists, the earth began approximately 4.5 billion years ago, with the explosion of life beginning around 55 million years ago. To evolutionists, the starting of life began as inorganic molecules that underwent a natural transformation (through electricity or heat) to become organic molecules. These building blocks joined to form macromolecule chains that eventually made up organisms.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the section "Pumpkins Like To Grow Under Sunny Skies."
TEA [102]
B, they usually grow well in new England States
3 0
3 years ago
What is a more formal way of saying "not worthwhile"?
zavuch27 [327]
Worth, worthy, useful, valuable, profitable, interesting, meaningful, praiseworthy, commendable, rewarding, desirable, laudable, advantageous, noteworthy, creditable, cost-effective, appropriate, notable, suitable, penalty, instrumental, purposeful, substantial.
8 0
3 years ago
Hey I need help now plz
lora16 [44]

the second and fourth one go in main idea. the first and third one go in key detail. hope that helps

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not a position taken by structural linguists?
MissTica

What structural linguists do not take is:

<u>Grammer content sets a pattern of common to a given</u>

<h2>Further Explanation </h2>

Structure in language, the term structure is related to language as a system. The structural approach to language implies an approach that considers language as a system with certain characteristics, the use of the word "structure" in structuralism is accompanied by all the contexts that have been described, namely significant-signifies, parole-langue, the synchronous irony.

1. Significant and significant

This distinction is at the heart of Saussure's view of the sign. In popular opinion, a sign of language shows objects in reality.

2. Langage, parole, and Langue

So that linguistic objects can be determined further, if the language phenomenon is generally indicated by the term language, then the language must be distinguished between parole and langue. By the word parole, it is intended to use individual languages. If we look for translations in English, speech or language use can be submitted. But parole is not studied by linguistics.

3. Synchrony and diachrony

Diachrony is a historical observation while synchrony shows a view that is not separated from the historical perspective, synchrony is a historical observation.

Learn more

language structure brainly.com/question/2863625, brainly.com/question/1564754

Details

Class: High School

Subject: English

Keywords: language structure

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write second conditional sentences.
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following sentences contains parallel structure?
    10·2 answers
  • In which way does poetry today differ from poetry written In the 14th century? A. the theme has fallen out of fashion B. meter a
    13·2 answers
  • What is a unique take on beauty about?
    15·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt below and answer the question.
    9·1 answer
  • What is the suffix in the word Segregation?<br><br> se<br> seg<br> on<br> ation
    9·1 answer
  • 16. A rectangle of length (4x - 1) cm and breath 2xcm has an area of 10cm2. Find
    12·1 answer
  • What are your dislikes and like about to build a fire? why?Support your reasons
    9·1 answer
  • George wants to understand the reasons why World War I started. Which type of essay should he read?
    15·1 answer
  • 2. Which sentence uses correct spelling?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!