Answer:
parliamentary government that excluded many citizens
Explanation:
The type of government that existed in 1909 was a parliamentary government that excluded many citizens. This government focused on copying the same proceedings that existed in Great Britain by creating a senate and House of Representatives. This all ended a year later when the South African people became a union and managed to achieve self-determination.
<span>The answer is C. It limited social mobility.
The caste system of ancient India was a system in which people could not achieve a higher caste. For example, if a man was born in a poor family, he would never be able to get into a higher caste no matter how much he tries. It was a very rigid system.</span>
Parliament increased taxes on the colonists following the French and Indian War.
The Stamp Act was aimed mainly at southern states.
Although this question is opinionated, I believe that a government is absolutely mandatory to have a successful society. You simply cannot count on your citizens to agree on everything and all obey laws. It is human nature to want something for nothing, which is what laws are in place to prevent. You also would not have any form of protection such as a military, which means your society would get taken over by someone wot ha government very, very quickly. To put it short, yes, a government is 100% required.<span />
Nullification Crisis the legislature of South Carolina, a state in the United States, had declared "zero" the tariffs placed by the federal government on imported products. This created the “nullification crisis” that challenged the federal government's right to impose its own laws. A war was imminent.
The Bank War refers to the political struggle it has developed over reloading the Second Bank of the United States in the presidency of Andrew Jackson. The result was the Bank's dismissal and its replacement by state banks.
Indian Removal Act was authorized by the president to grant unstable land west of Mississippi in exchange for indigenous land within state borders. Some tribes accepted peacefully, but many resisted this relocation policy.
