I am not 100% sure but I believe the answer is A
You will have multiple answers, the following are:
1. Historians with different perspectives
2. Historians with different points of view
3. Historians with varying personal biases
4. Historians with different interests of cause and effect
Hope this helps! Good luck!
In this case, the doctrine the court was applying is the rule of reason.According to this judicial doctrine of antitrust law, it is a violation to take any action that will put an unreasonable restraint on trade.
Your answer is <span>The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) </span>
Loyalist: Tea overboard!!!
Patriot: Rebel rousing: Boston Tea party
