1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oee [108]
3 years ago
6

PLS HELP

History
1 answer:
Ivanshal [37]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

uh uh what the first person said

You might be interested in
We are prone to judge success by the index of our salaries or the size of our automobiles, rather than by the quality of our ser
jenyasd209 [6]
C. He thought that service was important
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2 questions to ask about the westward expansion
murzikaleks [220]
1. What were some reasons supporting up westward expansion, how’d it be if it americans?
2. What worker’s benefited more than others due to westward expansion?
7 0
3 years ago
Based on what you have learned in this lesson, write two to three sentences describing one success and one failure of Clinton’s
cupoosta [38]

When the Genocide Convention was passed by the United Nations in 1948, the world said, “Never again.”

But the history of the twentieth century instead proved that “never again” became “again and again.”  The promise the United Nations made was broken, as again and again, genocides and other forms of mass murder killed 170 million people, more than all the international wars of the twentieth century combined.

Why?  Why are there still genocides?  Why are there genocidal massacres going on right now in southern Sudan by the Sudanese government against Dinka, Nuer, and Nuba; in eastern Burma by the Burmese government against the Karen; in the Democratic Republic of the Congo by both government and rebel forces against Tutsis, Banyamulenge, Hutus, Hema, and Lendu?  Why has ethnic and religious hatred again reached the boiling point in Israel and Palestine; Côte d’Ivoire, and Burundi?                                                     

There are two reasons why genocide is still committed in the world:

1.        The world has not developed the international institutions needed to predict and prevent it.

2.        The world’s leaders do not have the political will to stop it.

In order to prevent genocide, we must first understand it.  We must study and compare genocides and develop a working theory about the genocidal process.  There are many Centers for the Study of Genocide that are doing that vital work – in Australia, Brussels, Copenhagen, Jerusalem, Montreal, Memphis, Minneapolis, New Haven, Nottingham, and elsewhere.

But studying genocide is not enough.  Our next task should be to create the international institutions and political will to prevent it.  Four institutions are needed: centers for early warning, programs for conflict transformation, standing forces for rapid intervention, and international courts for effective punishment.

1.  The U.N. Security Council and key governments need strong, independent Early Warning systems to predict where and when ethnic conflict and genocide are going to occur, and to present policy options on prevention and intervention.  The Brahimi report made by the special commission on U.N. Peace-keeping makes just such a recommendation, and it should be implemented.  Selected country desk officers and top officials of the U.N. system now hold monthly “Framework for Coordination” to discuss current crises, but inadequate staffing prevents long-range strategic planning.  There is not a single person at the United Nations whose responsible for genocide early warning and prevention.  Who do you call? Ghostbusters.

:P

<span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When Texas began growing _____________, overproduction brought a drop in southern prices.
slega [8]
<span>The most logical answer would be cotton. With Texas as such a large state and having such a large ability to produce such a plant, this would add such a glut to the cotton market that it would drive down overall prices significantly.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which statement is most likely an interpretation of the Second Amendment?
alexandr1967 [171]
The Second Amendment to the Constitution of United States states:

"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. "

From the given options, the option D is the most likely interpretation of the second amendment i.e. There should be no limits on owning and using guns. The point highlighted in rest of the options is not listed anywhere in the amendment.

Therefore, the correct option is D.
<span>There should be no limits on owning and using guns.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Explain how the process of a bill becoming a law shows the concept of checks and balances in our government.
    10·1 answer
  • Write a paragraph arguing why so many Americans get into debt more than anyone else in the world. Up to 89% of Americans owe ove
    7·1 answer
  • When discussing the Roman Republic, which statement BEST defines the term "plebeian"?
    15·1 answer
  • Which country acquired Guyana?
    6·1 answer
  • What were the three main motives for the establishment of Georgia?
    11·1 answer
  • Why were Japanese Americans living on the West Coast interned after the Pearl Harbor attack?
    8·2 answers
  • Explain the space race and how it affected America.
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Churchill make such a victorious speech in the middle of the Battle of Britain and not at the end?
    8·1 answer
  • List the successes and failures of Louis XIV.
    5·1 answer
  • How did the scientific revolution influence society
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!