1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andrew [12]
3 years ago
10

13. In 2003, how much did the United States spend on the War on Drugs?

History
1 answer:
-BARSIC- [3]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

im pretty it was 100 billion but none of those answers match

Explanation:

Since 1971, the war on drugs has cost the United States an estimated $1 trillion. In 2015, the federal government spent an estimated $9.2 million every day to incarcerate people charged with drug-related offenses—that's more than $3.3 billion annually.

You might be interested in
How did Congress come to be established as a two-house legislature?
Luda [366]
The congress decided on a two-house legislature during the philadelphia convention. they decided on creating the bicameral legislature, which consists of the house of reps and senates to ensure that everyone had equal representation.
7 0
3 years ago
The Russo-Japanese War was a conflict between Japan and Russia for territorial dominance in Manchuria and __________.
uranmaximum [27]
<span>The Russo-Japanese War was a conflict between Japan and Russia for territorial dominance in Manchuria and "B. Korea," since both nations were trying to acquire more natural resources. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP NO BOTS OR LINKS PLS!!
SCORPION-xisa [38]
It saids no links! But I’ll get the answer
3 0
3 years ago
What was a primary cause of the fall of the aztec empire?
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer:

Answer:

Lacking food and ravaged by smallpox disease earlier introduced by one of the Spaniards, the Aztecs, now led by Cuauhtemoc, finally collapsed after 93 days of resistance on the fateful day of 13th of August, 1521 CE. Tenochtitlan was sacked and its monuments destroyed.

Explanation:

There's little doubt that the ritual Aztec sacrifice contributed to the fall of the Aztec Empire, and in more ways than one. First, killing thousands of people, whether you or your neighbours, simply can't be good for a society. The loss of people in a loss that can't be calculated. Who knows how it would have been different if these people and their children had swelled the ranks that fought the Spanish, not to mention the other contributions they would have made. And although the Aztecs certainly weren't the first people ever to sacrifice humans, the fact that they did and the incredible number they sacrificed led to the hatred of some of the surrounding peoples. The powerful city-state of Tlaxcala was one of these. Many of their own had been sacrificed, and in the end they joined the Spaniards to fight the Aztecs. It may be that the Spanish simply were an excuse to start what was already an inevitable civil war. Lastly, it's believed that the horror of human sacrifice highly motivated the Spaniards to conquer what they considered an evil culture - in other words, they used it to justify their war with the empire.Naturally, religion played a part because of the sacrifices. It has been commonly believed that, at first, the Aztecs thought that the Spanish were gods.

This belief is more and more being questioned - it may be a fabrication. ReliNaturally, religion played a part because of the sacrifices. It has been commonly believed that, at first, the Aztecs thought that the Spanish were gods. This belief is more and more being questioned - it may be a fabrication. Religious, yes, but the nobles were also well educated. Even if they did have such a passing thought, it's unlikely it lasted long. In addition, there's no reason to believe that Cortes and his men wouldn't have been welcomed anyway, with similar results. Modern scholars are questioning whether this belief in the return of the god Quetzalcoatl was real or a later rewrite of history. Even more interesting is the theory that, at one point, the Aztecs did not completely destroy the Spanish army because they wanted more people to sacrifice to their gods. This was a tactical error that at least hastened the fall of the Aztec empire., yes, but the nobles were also well educated. Even if they did have such a passing thought, it's unlikely it lasted long. In addition, there's no reason to believe that Cortes and his men wouldn't have been welcomed anyway, with similar results. Modern scholars are questioning whether this belief in the return of the god Quetzalcoatl was real or a later rewrite of history. Even more interesting is the theory that, at one point, the Aztecs did not completely destroy the Spanish army because they wanted more people to sacrifice to their gods. This was a tactical error that at least hastened the fall of the Aztec empire. Disease played a huge part in the fall of the Aztec empire. Here's what happened.

After Cortes landed in Mexico, another Spanish army came from Cuba to make sure he followed orders. Cortes would have none of that, and went to fight them. In this new group was an African being held as a slave, who had smallpox, a very contagious disease.

empire.

Hope this helps! Brainlist?

6 0
3 years ago
Under the encomienda system, New World natives were
BlackZzzverrR [31]
B. permitted to retain control over their local lands
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the cause of the Norman invasion of Britain?
    14·2 answers
  • Why do you think the Spanish conquered the Aztec and the Inca instead of trading with them for gold and other resources? Write a
    12·2 answers
  • Please tell me good reasons why god doesn't exist
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following does NOT describe a political cartoon?
    6·2 answers
  • Why were the Articles of Confederation replaced? The Articles provided for a strong national government The Articles provided fo
    11·2 answers
  • The family line of Jesus is established in Isaiah. True False
    14·1 answer
  • The ____ is comprised of five popularly elected officials, who form the city council, pass ordinances, and control local governm
    11·1 answer
  • What were the negative consequences of British rule in India
    7·2 answers
  • How might have BRAT and the Treaty of Versailles have caused World War II?
    7·1 answer
  • What was Alexander Hamilton's role in the New Republic​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!