What is institutional advertising focused on promoting?

When early settlers needed to buy farming equipment and supplies, they often would use the milk, eggs, and crops their farms pro

Tasya [4]

Answer:

The correct answer is A)

Explanation:

There is no good or service that is unlimited.

The concept of the Barter system was simply a method of exchanging value for value.

It was phased away due to several reasons:
It was not a good store of value as many of the goods were perishable
it didn't make for good administration: It was too cumbersome and problematic. Imagine having to store three trailers of eggs awaiting a barter exchange

Cheers!

3 0

3 years ago

Which statement best describes the effects of low and high interest rates on the economy? Low interest rates encourage consumers

kirill115 [55]

The correct answer is A. Low interest rate encourage consumers to borrow and spend, while high interest rates encourage saving.

Interest rate is termed as the rate which a bank charges to its borrowers.

Nationally a good interest rat for a loan is 3.7%.

Recession and inflation are some effects of interest rate. We get to hear the federal funds rates if the interest rate falls or rises.

If the interest rate becomes high people will start to spend less to avoid the high cost.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Huai takes out a $3,600 student loan at 6.6% to help him with 2 years of community college. After finishing the 2 years, he tran

Alja [10]

Answer:

a. The monthly payment on loan 1 is $76.03.

b. The monthly payment on loan 2 is $411.69.

Explanation:

a. Calculate the monthly payment on loan 1.

To determine the amount of periodic payments, the present value of annuity formula should be used:

$PV=P(\frac{1-(1+r)^{-n} }{r} )$

Where:

PV= present value

p=periodic payment

i=rate of interest

n=number of periods

We get the data for this exercise:

PV= 3,600 (loan).

p= unknown (we must find this value)

i= 6.6% or 0.066. However, because we need to know the monthly payment, the interest rate should be divided by 12 (0.066 / 12).

n= 4 years and 7 months, that is 55 months.

And we replace in the formula:

$3600=P(\frac{1-(1+\frac{0.066}{12})^{-55} }{\frac{0.066}{12} } )$

$3600=P(\frac{1-(1+0.055)^{-55} }{0.0055} )$

$3600=P(\frac{1-(0.7395812268)}{0.0055} )$

$3600=P(\frac{0.2604187732}{0.0055} )$

$3600=P(47.348867)$

Therefore:

$P=\frac{3600}{47.348867}$

$P=76.03$

The monthly payment on loan 1 is $76.03.

b. Calculate the monthly payment on loan 2.

We get the data for this exercise:

PV= 11,600 (loan 2).

p= unknown (we must find this value)

i= 7.3% or 0.073. However, because we need to know the monthly payment, the interest rate should be divided by 12 (0.073 / 12).

n= 2 years and 7 months, that is 31 months.

And we replace in the formula:

$11600=P(\frac{1-(1+\frac{0.073}{12})^{-31} }{\frac{0.073}{12} } )$

$11600=P(\frac{1-(1+0.006083)^{-31} }{0.006083} )$

$11600=P(\frac{1-(0.8286047296)}{0.006083} )$

$11600=P(\frac{0.1713952704}{0.006083} )$

$11600=P(28.1761088936)$

Therefore:

$P=\frac{11600}{28.1761088936}$

$P=411.69$

The monthly payment on loan 2 is $411.69.

8 0

3 years ago

Round Hammer is comparing two different capital structures: An all-equity plan (Plan l) and a levered plan (Plan Il). Under Plan

Dominik [7]

Explanation:

A). The computation of price per share is shown below:-

Debt outstanding ÷ (Stock outstanding of Plan 1 - Stock outstanding of

Plan 2)

= $1,730,000 ÷ (205,000 - 125,000)

= $21.63 per share

B a.) Under equity plan the value is

= Debt outstanding × Stock outstanding of Plan 1

= $21.63 × 205,000 shares

= $4,433,125

B b.) under the levered plan the value is

Price per share × Stock outstanding of Plan 2 + Debt outstanding

= $21.63 × 125,000 shares + $1,730,000

= $2,703,125 + $1,730,000

= $4,433,125

6 0

3 years ago

Two towns, each with three members, are deciding whether to put on a fireworks display to celebrate the new year. fireworks cost

Burka [1]

1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is 450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass the cost benefit analysis.

If the fireworks' cost is to be split equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would

We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.

2) Town of River Heights:

We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be bought.

However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.

Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.

3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.

Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.

The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers