It is important because a narrative is supposed to tell you about all the important parts of a story so without the key events it wouldn't be a complete narrative.
I think you forgot to write an interduction and a conclusion which states what you are trying to prove for example if you where trying to prove that you are the best and thats what you belive the reading states (sry the only thing came to mind) then you would write. "In (where you read from like a book) by (author) the theme (or what you are explaning) is that I am the best." And then add all the examples and everything and for the conclusion you would put. "In conclusion this reading states that I am the best." And by the way NEVER put In conclusion this is why I am the best. ok Good luck!
Hello.
One literary device, which is more often associated as a philosophical device, is the dialectic<span>. This involves the discussion of a concept and its opposite. Another way of thinking of it is that dialectic involves a contradiction (X and its opposite) and a possible solution, balance, or synthesis (combination of X and its opposite)
</span>
Have a nice day
Answer:A summary of Themes in Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron. ... among all Americans, the government in Vonnegut's story tortures its citizens. ... Some behave this way because they have internalized the government's goals, and others because they fear that the government will punish them severely if they display any ...
Explanation:
Answer:
If you are taking a test on a passage and you already read the passage, a great strategy would be to look at text features, annotate the passage, and ask questions to yourself about the passage.
