Answers with Explanation:
1. What is the narrator's realization at the end of the story?
The narrator realized that she didn't want her husband to take off his turban if his job requires so in Canada. She also didn't want her husband to cut his long hair, which the company also required. She'd rather look for a job and work, as long as her husband would keep his turban in his head.
2. How does washing the turbans cause her perspective to change?
Washing the turban made her realize their culture and the meaning it has for them. It also reminded her how his father and brother have worn it in a similar fashion throughout their lives. Removing it would mean leaving behind an important part of their Indian lives and disrespecting their culture. The narrator would rather see her husband wear the turban with head high in Canada so that the Canadians will know how much they value their Indian culture.
Answer: death
Explanation:
death or something that causes death, regarded as a release from life.
Answer: A group of people working together to do a project
Explanation: Definition
It says that people should protest against the unjust laws of racism but should have a non violence resistance towards it.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The letter written by Martin Luther king Jr said that people should not bear any kind of unjust done to them. They should protest against it but that protest should not have violent attempt.
The goal of the letter was that it said that people should have a non violent strategy towards fighting for racism. It says that it is the moral responsibility of the people to fight against that injustice and should not quietly wait for it forever to finish the injustice on it's own or to quietly bear the injustice done against the people.
Answer:
Dr. King’s tone as he begins his letter is remarkably restrained. Considering the context – he was in solitary confinement when he learned that Birmingham clergymen had together issued a statement criticizing him and praising the city’s bigoted police force – he had every reason to make his letter a rant. And yet this address announces his purpose loud and clear: he aims not to attack but to explain. Rather than indicate what separates him from the other clergy, he calls them “fellow clergymen,” underlining one of the letter’s main themes: brotherhood. Of course, there is no shortage of passive aggressive attacks and criticism throughout the letter, but the tone remains polite, deferential, at times almost apologetic, creating a friendly and ironic tone. This marvelous collection of attributes is present from these very first words.
Explanation:
