Without you providing us with the diagram, I can still offer you some thought about the effect of the Smoot-Hawley Act and protective tariffs. Sponsored by Senator Reed Smoot and Congressman Willis Hawley, the intent of their tariff act was to protect American jobs during the economic crisis of the Depression. However, when the US imposed protective tariffs, other nations retaliated with tariffs of their own. Thus American exports and imports were cut in half and the Depression grew worse, not better.
We should note this too: While economists agree that Smoot-Hawley worsened the Depression, how large of a factor it was is a matter that economists debate. Some say the tariffs played a minor role compared to other aggravating factors of the Depression. However, the Foundation for Economic Education asserts that the economists who want to minimize the role of the Tariff Act are wrong to do so. Underestimating the negative impact of protective tariffs can be very dangerous economically -- then and now.
<span>B. The purchase of bonds reduces the bond buyers' bank accounts </span>
(C) An academic researcher asks a magazine to publish her findings on pollution
Answer:
<em>¡Qué emoción!</em>
<em>¡Naturaleza pura ante mí!</em>
Oración oracional... ¿o exclamativa?
Explanation:
I didn´t know <em>Oración oracional </em>exists. It doesn´t sound right to me. I prefer the term <em>Oración exclamativa</em> used by Larousse in order to express direct speech, using quotation-, question- or exclamation marks.
But the lines with exclamation marks, as shown in the answer, cannot be considered sentences (oraciones) because they lack the presence of a verb. So I´m a little bit puzzled. I do know that there are three phrases (<em>frases)</em> that are not complete sentences: the two lines mentioned above and <em>Gran error.</em>
Answer:
True, Chinese were about 2500 years later
Explanation:
