1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dangina [55]
2 years ago
15

What's your interpretation, consider these three arguments on the causes of WW2

History
2 answers:
Colt1911 [192]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

b

Explanation:

bogdanovich [222]2 years ago
7 0
The answer is b
Ur welcome
You might be interested in
1) How did Cornelius Vanderbilt gain his wealth as a businessman?
Zolol [24]
In the 1860s, he shifted his focus to the railroad industry, where he built another empire and helped make railroad transportation more efficient. When Vanderbilt died, he was worth more than $100 million.Apr 16, 2010
Family: Vanderbilt family
Spouse: Sophia Johnson, Frank Armstrong Crawford Vanderbilt
Died: January 4, 1877, Manhattan
Born: May 27, 1794, Staten Island
6 0
2 years ago
How did land affect Native Americans?
WITCHER [35]

Answer:

because people would fight over land to grow crops and build houses etc.

Explanation:

5 0
1 year ago
Following the Civil War, what effect did the decline in agricultural prices have upon farmers in the West? It hurt them by incre
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

It hurt them by reducing the money they had to pay back loans.

Explanation:

After the civil war, the West region found itself in a great expansion and attracted many independent farmers who saw that land as an opportunity to grow economically. However, the war caused a sharp drop in the prices of agricultural products, causing these farms to spend more money than they profited from their farms, which ended up generating debts that were accumulating more and more.

5 0
3 years ago
What was the Supreme Court case that legalized same sex relationships?
mamaluj [8]

Answer:

Explanation:

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) (/ˈoʊbərɡəfɛl/ OH-bər-gə-fel), is a landmark civil rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The 5–4 ruling requires all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas to perform and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples on the same terms and conditions as the marriages of opposite-sex couples, with all the accompanying rights and responsibilities.[2][3]

Between January 2012 and February 2014, plaintiffs in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee filed federal district court cases that culminated in Obergefell v. Hodges. After all district courts ruled for the plaintiffs, the rulings were appealed to the Sixth Circuit. In November 2014, following a series of appeals court rulings that year from the Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits that state-level bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional, the Sixth Circuit ruled that it was bound by Baker v. Nelson and found such bans to be constitutional.[4] This created a split between circuits and led to a Supreme Court review.

Decided on June 26, 2015, Obergefell overturned Baker and requires all states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and to recognize same-sex marriages validly performed in other jurisdictions.[5] This established same-sex marriage throughout the United States and its territories. In a majority opinion authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court examined the nature of fundamental rights guaranteed to all by the Constitution, the harm done to individuals by delaying the implementation of such rights while the democratic process plays out,[6] and the evolving understanding of discrimination and inequality that has developed greatly since Baker.[7]

Prior to Obergefell, same-sex marriage had already been established by law, court ruling, or voter initiative in thirty-six states, the District of Columbia, and Guam.[3]

7 0
3 years ago
How did demobilization affect labor in 1919?
Harlamova29_29 [7]
Because males were returning from war, the females who previously held the males' positions in factories, etcetera, were either forced out of these jobs, or were permitted to keep them, a trend that destroyed the idea of the "stay-at-home mom". 
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the bill of rights have less influence over American life in the 19th century?
    11·2 answers
  • What incident aboard marked the election day of the 1956 election, thereby enchancing Eisenhower's bid for a second term?
    9·1 answer
  • How did South Carolina respond to the attempt by Britain to gain more control over its colonies?
    6·1 answer
  • Alfred wegener's hypothesis of "continental drift" was rejected by his peers in the early 1900's because he failed to
    10·1 answer
  • The quran is the Islamic sacred book, that is written down in arabic. It is believed to be the word of God as dictated to Mohamm
    6·2 answers
  • Which explanation displays best why they were called “Hoovervilles”
    12·2 answers
  • How did the European Union’s new common market change life for workers?
    14·2 answers
  • Help pls!!!
    13·2 answers
  • Ayuda gente nesecito 5 ideas sacadas de este video<br> el video se llama ( ¿que es budismo? )
    11·1 answer
  • President George H. W. Bush's "thousand points of light" referred to which of the following?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!