Answer:
Ewald Georg von Kleist (10 de junio de 1700 - 11 de diciembre de 1748) fue un jurista, clérigo luterano y físico alemán.Un miembro de la familia von Kleist, Ewald nació en Wicewo (Wicewo) en Pomerania más lejana. Estudió jurisprudencia en la Universidad de Leipzig y la Universidad de Leyden y es posible que haya comenzado su interés por la electricidad en esta última universidad bajo la influencia de Gravesande de Willem. De 1722 a 1745 fue decano de la catedral de Kamień Pomorski en el Reino de Prusia, después de lo cual se convirtió en presidente de la corte real de justicia de Koszalin.El 11 de octubre de 1745 inventó de forma independiente el tarro kleistiano que podía almacenar electricidad en grandes cantidades. Comunicó este descubrimiento a un grupo de científicos de Berlín a fines de 1745, y la noticia se transfirió de forma confusa a la Universidad de Leyden, donde se investigó más a fondo. Esto se conoció más comúnmente como la jarra de Leyden en honor al estudiante graduado de Gravesande, Pieter van Musschenbroek de Leyden.
¡Realmente espero que te ayude! ꨄ︎
Probably the noblest and most humane purpose of punishment in the criminal law is rehabilitation. When a citizen's criminal tendencies are "cured" (in a manner of speaking) so that he or she never has the urge to commit crime again and, even further, becomes a productive member of society, then society is not only protected from future harm but it's also made richer by the successful re-entry of one of its members. It's a win-win situation in which both society and criminal offenders benefit.
Idealogically, rehabilitation is a very sound goal for punishment. It's pleasant and beautiful to imagine the successful general rehabilitation of society's criminals. If only adult criminals could be successfully rehabilitated, then the phenomenon of crime could be all but eliminated, and criminal offenses restricted from then on to juvenile delinquency and the occasional act of passion.
Ah, if only. While few seriously argue against the utility of reforming criminal offenders, there are powerful arguments against placing too much importance on rehabilitation, not the least of which is that it tends not to work. In 1994, over sixty percent of criminal offenders who were released from U.S. correctional facilities were arrested again within three years or less. Fifty percent went back into the system. High recidivism rates are a powerful argument against the effectiveness of rehabilitation in the criminal law. It is time-consuming and dubious effort to meaningfully reform serious criminals, and it costs more for tax-payers. However fine and noble the idea of reforming criminals into productive members of society may be, the statistics alone speak out strongly against the attempt.
On the other hand, it is probably a bit much to argue that criminal offenders are fundamentally unworthy of the efforts of rehabilitation, and that it's good for them to suffer for what they've done without any help or reprieve. Perhaps. In the real world, many criminals may be truly un-reformable, and any attempt to rehabiliate them would be a waste of effort and resources. Also, the pain of crime victims and their loved ones cannot be ignored or reasoned away, and to deny them some feeling of satisfied vengeance could be seen as an abject failure of the justice system. But, all things considered, it is at least feasable for a society that cherishes the precept "innocent until proven guilty" to some day place equal value on the precept "reformable until proven otherwise." Of course, the only way to prove this is to try.
Answer:
Listen to Zulaya's plans. Then put the sentences in the correct order
+ Zulaya is going to study
Zulaya and her sister are going to play tennis.
+ Zulaya and her friends are going to buy clothes.
Zulaya is going to sleep all morning.
* Zulaya is going to have lunch at her aunt Silvia's house.
Zulaya and her friends are going to a party.
dont know the story
Explanation:
Answer:
No me gustan las pasas.
Explanation:
'Pasas' is the only word in the feminine plural form to match the 'gustas' and 'las' in the original sentence.
<em>Hope this helps!</em>
1. Yo
2. Ellas
3. El
4. Tu
5. Usted
6. Ustedes
7. Nosotros
