"if men were angels, no government would be necessary"
- Extended to the idea of government, this rightly suggests that the raison d'être of a central authority must be to protect the human beings's natural rights (of lifestyles, liberty, property etc.)
- The lack of confidence and vulnerability of the people in a society that isn't always ruled seem too heavy a rate to pay for unrestrained freedom. that is in keeping with Rousseau's theory of the 'social agreement' or the 'social compact', where he argued that human beings surrender a number of their freedom and conform to be governed via certain legal guidelines, for security and safety.
- Whilst one tries to justify the want for governance, what comes to mind at once is the want for safety.
Learn more about governance brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
Hey would u like to come to my speech it would be really fun and entertaining
Hello ☺️,
The answer will be:-
" What <u>a</u> grand building! "
✍️ <em>By </em><em>Benjemin</em> ☺️
Answer: Choice A
Choice A goes over a negative aspect about wild animals, while choice B talks about a slight positive aspect in that certain animals can be kept as pets. The two don't really fit together.
In other words, choice A is saying "don't get a wild animal as a pet" while choice B does the opposite (more or less).
While it is true that you can keep some animals as pets, it's not a good idea as choice A mentions. Also, there's the fact that the animal may attack you or people you know if the animal is provoked (even then wild animals can attack seemingly at random). Lastly, there's the fact that wild animals prefer living outside with lots of room to roam around. They don't like being caged up and need to have a specific habitat and diet. All of these facts lean toward having wild animals as pets is a bad idea. This is especially true for large animals in which you'll need more resources to take care of them. A zoo is better equipped to handle the animals.
