Answer:
A. The author believes there is no genre of greater historical importance to the Japanese society than manga. This is proven in the first paragraph when the author explains its popularity dating back to the 18th century.
Explanation:
A general statement about the author's point of view is that manga is significant. The piece of evidence from the text that best clarifies and supports this point of view is option A.
This is because, the author believes that the manga is significant and is of great historical importance to Japan and is the most important genre in Japanese history as it dates back to the 18th century.
Answer: I think it is c.
Explanation: Because it will make sense that it is c because the sun and breeze were both like a gentle person in the small paragraph it said the warm sun stroking his cheek an the soft breeze whispering in his ears so i would think that it's c.
The answer is C or D. all poems are complex to understand, but most of them have the same rhyme scheme.
Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>