Answer:
Answer: The issues like political will and orientation, jurisdictional clarity, transitional management, sectoral coordination, governmental autonomy, technical competency, extensive revenue utilization, judicious allocation of resources, financial discipline, credibility and accountability etc.
Because this is one of the ways we communicate with our children and what you put out in the universe is what you get back from,the universe
Answer:
Group polarization.
Explanation:
Group polarization is when inside a group what first was an inclination to some ideas, after the individuals talk, those same ideas become much more stronger and radical. As the exercise exemplifies, the jury is deliberating and their initial attitudes are leaning neutral to slighty toward a guilty verdict. After a few days of deliberation, their ideas have strengthened considerably toward a guilty verdict. That's a good example of group polarization.
Categorical comparison is not a pattern for organizing an informative speech
Explanation:
<u>Instead of Categorical Comparison, the process of chronological comparison is employed for the development of an informative speech.</u>
<u>The objective of an informative speech is to convey as much information as possible in a clear and concise manner</u> and as such these different types of strategies help one to achieve that with clarity and with maximum efficiency in conveying the information to the listeners.
