Ruling out rival hypotheses, Findings consistent with several hypotheses
require additional research to eliminate these hypotheses. More five principles
of critical thinking are: (1.) Correlation vs. Causation, the fact that two
things are associated with each other doesn’t mean that one causes the other.
(2.) Replicability, a finding must be capable of being duplicated by
independent researchers following the same recipe. (3.) Occam’s Razor,
if two hypotheses explain a phenomenon equally well, we should generally select
the simpler one. (4.) Falsifiability, claims
must be capable of being disproved. (5.) Extraordinary Claims, the more a
claim contradicts what we already know, the more persuasive the evidence must
be before we should accept it.
I think . circular motions in the atmosphere.
Answer:
People sometimes may think that it as not severe as it actually is, and not properly prepare and get their house destroyed. (The upcoming and this sentence is pre-written and copy and pasted in every brainly question or comment I write or answer.) If this answer helped you please consider giving it brainliest. If my answer was wrong and you got marked wrong for it, I deeply apologize and hope you will forgive me, since everyone makes mistakes sometimes. If you need me to elaborate on my answer or give further explanation on it, please ask and I will do so. If you need to explain your reasoning on your work feel free to use my words- word for word- without crediting me, the answer was made for you anyways! Hope yall learn from my answer and it helps you in the future with assignments, quizzes, test’s, and more!
- •Trix•
( Yes I know my - •Trix• thingy is not my user but it’s what I would change it to if I could but I can't, please address me as Trix while commenting or talking to me here.)
Answer:
The correct answer is: True.
Explanation:
<u>Moral imperatives can be understood as strong principles that lead a person through life to act in ways he/she considers morally right. </u>
<u>Moral imperatives are not utilitarian; this means that the person does not act in favor of the consequences that will result from acting in a particular way, but rather because acting in such a way, it's the right thing to do.</u>
<u>The concept of moral imperative was described by Immanuel Kant, and they were part of the broader concept of categorical imperatives.</u>
In conclusion, to the statement: <u>A moral imperative</u> prescribes an action, not for the sake of some result, but simply because that action is our moral duty, the correct answer is: True.
<span>In order to avoid crashes
the one who is responsible when drivers, motorcyclists, bicyclists and
pedestrians share the road is apparently the driver. It is the responsibility
of the driver to exercise complete control over movements on the road. They are
responsible to avoid crashes since they have the complete control over the
vehicle or does not have a full view of the roadway and the traffic ahead of
such vehicle.</span>
