The answer to the question above is "C) Precedent" which is the kind of reasoning that Justice Fortas uses to support his argument when he refers to Keyishian v Board of Regents in the majority opinion for Tinker v Des Moines<span>. The precedent is the kind of reasoning which a person uses by using legal aspect support. Abe Fortas is a man with a law background. Thus, precedent is the most likely kind of reasoning he uses.</span>
i wish i could help im clueless
Answer:
it express how he desired to show different ways to express his feeling and because of that it was some what similar to both shake spear and Armstrong.
Explanation:
i don't know what its about but hope this helps
whats the story and/or questions?
Answer:
Because she has been in the town the longest. She has helped others her whole life, so she would have been an unlikely suspect.
Explanation:
hope this helps
