Answer:
reachable
Explanation:
Market segments constitutes market divisions or product of market segmentation whereby the market for goods and services is divided into various segments each holding together consumers that share certain characteristics rekevant for the product consumption. Characteristics such as lifestyle, needs, demography, common interest are all considered.
College students segmentation however involve young people with varied traits and habits and could be less predictable and challenging to get to.
With the first one,you're going to want to use Ethos,or the appeal to emotions,for this to work. I would say this: There is an extent to which someone can be punished. If somebody committed murder,the death penalty,or more politely called "Capital Punishment",would honestly have no effect on them. It does not truly give them a chance to dwell on their actions and how they messed up someone's life. Not only that,but you also become a murderer if an innocent man is found guilty of a murder he didn't commit,which makes you no better than a murderer. Worse in fact because at least the person who actually did kill someone did it them selves and not with an executioner. I don't support Capital punishment because that puts someone else's blood on my hands.
As for the second one...I'd say this: By nature,humans are social creatures. We desire human contact and interaction. In fact,we NEED it in order to function normally. Capital Punishment only supports the tradition of "An Eye For An Eye And A Tooth For A Tooth." If you really want to punish someone,don't kill them physically,but instead mentally and socially. If you take away someone's ability to interact with people,it causes them to think back on their mistakes and it leaves them with no other choice but to confront their bad choices. Capital Punishment gets it over with quickly with no time to repent or ask for forgiveness,but life in prison with no chance of parole unless proven mentally capable by a team of psychologists,is by far the worst punishment you could ever give someone.
Answer:
Major General Andrew Jackson fought the Battle of New Orleans for a number of reasons. First is that neither the British not Jackson and his men had heard that the two warring sides had already signed a treaty to end the hostilities in Ghent, Belgium on December 24th, 1814. Also, Jackson had been a prisoner of the British during the American Revolution and he was said to still hold a lot of personal animosity towards them for that reason.
Explanation:
Jackson had declared martial law in New Orleans and called on anyone and everyone to try to defend the city from the British incursion. Skirmishes began on Dec 23rd, 1814 and culminated in the Battle of New Orleans on the 8th of January, 1815. The American group of militia fighters and whomever else was prepared to defend the city were able to outwit the British who suffered many casualties despite the upper hand they had in terms of tactics and equipment.
Answer: It’s b. Took the test and got that answer correct.
Explanation:
Answer:
с
. The United States entered the wars to stop the spread of communism.
Explanation:
The Korean War was fought between 195-53 while the Vietnam War was fought from 1955-75. And in both wars, the parties involved included not only the namesake countries but also foreign powers such as the United States, Soviet Union, and China.
But the one major similarity between these wars was that the United States joined the war to prevent an all-out spreading of communism. With the Chinese and Soviet forces supporting communism, victory in these wars would mean the spread of a communist government. And it was this want of preventing such a government that the United States got involved in it.
Thus, the<u> correct answer is option C.</u>
