Answer:
The answer is SLAVES.
Explanation:
During early 1600, Virginia became one of the English colonies in the United States. In August 1619, the frigate 'White Lion' was the first ship to arrive at Virginia bringing Africans who would be slaves to work on tobacco plantations. This marked the beginning of slavery in the US.
Africans worked as indentured servants until 1661 when Virginia passed a law allowing any free person the right to own slaves.
Because <span>Bauhaus artists rejected traditional German values.</span>
Answer:
USSR under the leadership of Josef Stalin was a living hell to peasants and farmers alike. Stalin's regime aimed to completely indoctrinate everything under communism. Farmers were seen as part of the bourgeoisie (as Marx dubbed the middle class, who were destroying society in his view) since they owned land, so they forced them to cede their land to the government and live in community farms. Additionally, biologists like Trofim Lysenko produced theories that seeds can "help" other plant seeds that were struggling to survive, so they should be planted all in the same hole so they can do this. Lysenkoism was the belief that biology was being taught in a capitalistic standard and that since communism was in the state of nature, nature of communistic. Thousands starved to death, but the leaders deeply believed that they were doing it out of spite, and the failing crops were not because of Lysenkoism but because of sabotage from capitalist sympathizers. Thousands more were imprisoned for the crime of starving and were brought to prisons so they can die quietly without international attention. No one was allowed to criticize the government as it was seen as treason. It was an awful period of time.
In setting laws for its people and being fair
An eye for an eye
The correct answer is answer C ("The article will be biased because the historian is using only one source about the ruler").
If a historian only took this one scroll to write a biography on its subject (the ruler), it would most likely be extremely misleading and inaccurate. There's no way of getting closer to the truth of any subject without contrasting a variety of opinions from different sources. What if people working for this ruler wrote it in a way that made him look good? What if it was written under pressure? What if it was a complete lie? These and many other questions should come to mind as possible ways in which relying on one source might compromise historical facts.
Hope this helps!
