Answer:
The United States homefront during World War I saw a systematic mobilization of the country's entire population and economy to produce the soldiers, food supplies, ammunitions and money necessary to win the war.
Explanation:
Fundamentalism is an all or nothing proposition. Either the Bible is the literal word of god which is 100% accurate in all things, or it isn't. There is no middle ground.
<span>If evolution is true, then the whole thing falls apart at step one. The book is "wrong" from page one. Creationists don't want evolution taught in schools because it's teaching every single evolution student that the Bible isn't literally true. </span>
<span>The fact that evolution and Christianity are not mutually exclusive is lost on creationists. The fact that the creation story was clearly written to be a parable and not science isn't something they seem aware of (but to be fair, it's a distinction that a lot of atheists miss as well).</span>
Night vision goggles using image enhancement technology collect all the available light, including infrared light, and amplify it so that you can easily see what's going on in the dark. The other way uses a technology called thermal imaging.
Machiavelli believes that <span>the princes can use and should use violence in order to survive or to achieve their aims as rulers, especially when there is a problem in the country ot connected with the country. In such situations the princes should keep the people in fear, so no one would want to attack them or take their power. Otherwise, by providing housing and women, he should keep the peace in the country, In this sense is contradictory how he advises the princes to be more liberal. </span>
Explanation:
Henry VIII did not have the same approach to government as Henry VII had done. Henry VII was very much a person who wanted to involve himself in the day-to-day running of government – almost in fear that he would lose control of government if he was not in as much control as was possible in those days of limited communication. Henry VIII took a very different approach. He believed that government could be left to trusted men who once they knew the king’s wishes would implement them. Therefore, though Henry VIII was not overly involved in government, his men were actually carrying out his policies. Henry believed that his men were honourable and that loyalty would be their guiding star. Therefore, he did not need to involve himself in government as his trusted and loyal ministers would do it for him. Success was likely to be rewarded. Most, if not all, knew what failure meant.
Henry’s ministers knew that there were only two times in the day when Henry might be available to discuss policy – around the time each day that he took Mass and after dinner. Even then, neither time could be guaranteed, especially the latter. Henry was very good at quickly understanding issues that needed to be answered. While history tends to remember his six wives and infamous temper, it tends to forget that Henry was an intelligent man though probably not as intelligent as he thought he was. He was not the “universal genius” that Erasmus called him either. However, there is little doubt that in the early years of his reign, Henry could easily digest information when it suited his purpose to do so. Keith Randall described Henry as a “shrewd politician”.