Community corrections officials in South Africa face several problems when monitoring offenders in communities such as:
- Lack of manpower
- Lying by community members
- Danger to correctio official
Community correction officials are tasked with monitoring offenders who were not put in jail by the Court but were instead ordered to serve their sentence in communities by doing certain things.
In South Africa, some challenges these officials might face include:
- Lack of manpower - because of high crime rates in South Africa, corrections officials may be assigned to too many offenders which would reduce the effectiveness of their monitoring.
- Lies by community members - members of the community might lie to protect offenders when they commit fresh crimes or fail to do what the courts instructed them to do so that the offenders do not end up in jail.
- Danger to correction official - South Africa has seen its fair share of violence against law enforcement officials. Corrections officials going into the community to monitor offenders can therefore put them at risk of being harmed by criminals in the community.
In conclusion, community corrections programs might have certain advantages but they can present various challenges to officials.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/3043600.</em>
Answer:
B) Judiciary Act of 1789.
Explanation:
John Marshall ruled on this case as the Chief Justice. He first answered that Marbury had a right to his job because it had been signed and approved. The actual delivery was a custom, not a requirement. He then ruled that a writ of mandamus (a type of court order) was the correct way for Marbury to rule. Finally, he noted that the Judiciary Act of 1789 allowed the Supreme Court to make this kind of ruling.
<em>The next question was who could decide this issue. Marshall ruled that the Supreme Court could decide it because the Judiciary Act of 1789 said that they could. However, Marshall said that a section of the Judiciary Act was unconstitutional. That section allowed the Supreme Court to make a writ but the United States Constitution did not. Therefore, that section was unconstitutional and the Supreme Court could not make a writ for Marbury.
</em>
Marshall looking over the Constitution and the statute is judicial review, a statement that the Supreme Court had an independent power to determine whether something was constitutional or not.
American leaders hoped that Nixon's Vietnamization program would have the following three results and they were show North Vietnam that the United States was serious about the Paris Peace talks, show confidence in the South Vietnamese forces and relieve the pressure of discontent at home.
