My last answer was deleted for being pointless, but I had to add more letters for the correct, succinct answer to be published. The right answer is "a sentence".
The first one. They are two separate sentences.
The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
Even though you did say never mind, I would say a bit of both. Both together make a good leader.
Answer:
It is important to look at topics from multiple perspectives so that we are able to see the whole picture
moon dust is 50% SiO2, 15% Al2O3, 10% CaO, 10% MgO, 5% TiO2 and 5-15% iron
black disqust
Black mold often grows in tight corners in the bathroom. The best way to identify black mold is by its color.
Explanation:
