Theories of moral philosophy together with teleological moral and deontological moral theories: Teleological ethics decide the goodness or badness of movement by means of analyzing its results while deontological ethics decide the goodness or badness of the motion through examining the movement itself.
Ethics or moral philosophy is a department of philosophy that "involves systematizing, protecting, and recommending concepts of proper and incorrect behavior". the sphere of ethics, together with aesthetics, issues topics of a fee; those fields incorporate the branch of philosophy called axiology.
consistent with this moral philosophy, an act is moral if it contributes to a person's virtuous character. Take stealing, as an example: Case 1: someone not using cash steals cigarettes from a tobacconist because they're hooked on smoking.
Moral philosophy empowers us through its method and substance to mirror and communicate about challenging moral problems. studying ethics may even propel a private journey, in which we learn about ourselves and the way we think. we'd even research how others think in distinct methods.
Learn more about moral philosophy here: brainly.com/question/14406712
#SPJ9
The correct answer is B; They allow multiple law enforcement agencies to combine their intelligence, resources, and personnel to target a specific problem.
Further Explanation:
Task forces are put together and used by numerous local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies. There are many reasons this is done such as combining all the resources into one unit, having more personnel to work on the cases, and having more resources to get the cases solved. Task forces are put together for missing persons, murder cases, unsolved crimes, and drug cases.
When there is more than one jurisdiction involved the task force is more likely to be started. This is also beneficial for long term cases so that they don't have to work short staffed and have just the one case to focus on. Tasks forces will always have experts for different things so that the expertise is used to their advantage.
Learn more about task forces at brainly.com/question/12394318
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
A rebuttable presumption is assumed true until a person proves otherwise (for example the presumption of innocence). In contrast, a conclusive (or irrebuttable) presumption cannot be refuted in any case (such as defense of infancy in some legal systems).Explanation:
Answer:
a. How will the $20,000 payments be treated by Fred and Tammy if covered by prior law? b. How will the payments be treated if the divorce is covered by new law? c. What is Tammy's basis in the residence? d. What role would a tax adviser play in a divorce?
Explanation:
a. For Fred, the 20,000 must be included in income. There is no deduction for paying alimony. For Tammy, the amount is not included in income.
b. If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Fred can deduct the $20,000 payments as alimony.
If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Tammy must include the $20,000 payments in gross income.
c. It's $100.000,00
d. Tax advisors are responsible for determining the value of property given in lieu of cash for an alimony payment.
Answer:
In the case of Parsons v. State, 1887, the Irresistible Impulse Test was first introduced.
Explanation:
The Court of Alabama stated that, although it would have been possible that the defendant had right from wrong, that he had "dismissed the power of choice between right and wrong" and that, "at a time when his free organization was destroyed," and that therefore, the alleged crime was so closely related, in relation to cause and effect, to such a mental disease that it has been the result of.
I hope this was understood very well, and as always, I am joyous to assist anyone at any time. ☺️
