Answer: Colin's evidence is not relevant to his claim<u> because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.</u>
Explanation: Colin's evidence is not related to his main claim, that is to say the assertion that drones do not invade people's privacy<u>. Instead of focusing on providing evidence that supports the idea that drones do not affect people's privacy negatively, Colin offers evidence related to the thought that flying drones is a sport </u>by stating that coordination and technical skills are necessary to fly drones. Therefore, it can be said that his argument lacks strength because it has not been properly supported.
Answer:
A and C
Explanation:
A. If I were the president, I would create more jobs.
C: If Diane had been a cat, she would have climbed the tallest trees.
The answer would be false
Answer:
The event where he went to the haunted house and saw all those Jews suffering which he pretty much refered hell
Explanation:T
