For the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
<h3>Who were the Federalists?</h3>
The Federalists were American Founding Fathers who wanted a strong government and strong executive branch.
The Federalists were opposed by the anti-Federalists who wanted a weaker central government.
The Federalists did not vote for a bill of rights because they regarded the constitution as sufficient, unlike the anti-Federalists who demanded a bill of rights to be part of the Constitution.
Thus, for the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
Learn more about Federalists and Anti-Federalists at brainly.com/question/267094
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. Natural boundary
Explanation:
Haiti and the Dominican Republic share an island. The border of the two nations that divide the island of Hispaniola, in the Caribbean, has extreme contrasts. In many places in this area, one can look to the east (the Dominican side) and see pine forests, and when we turn to the other side (the Haitian), we see only fields almost devoid of trees. Originally, the island as a whole was known for the exuberance of its forests. Today, 28% of the vegetation cover is preserved in the Dominican Republic, compared to just 1% in Haiti - and the few Haitian reserves are threatened by peasants who cut down trees to make charcoal. The reason is historical. Despite being today one of the poorest countries in the world, Haiti developed a thriving agricultural economy in the 18th century, becoming the richest colony in France. At that time, the French empire decided to invest in intensive plantations based on slave labor, while Spain did not develop its side of the island (the Dominican Republic). In addition, all ships that brought slaves returned to Europe with loads of wood. This contributed to faster deforestation and loss of soil fertility - which you can see from the sky.
He had experience leading the continental army (militia) defeat Britain during the revolutionary war. Before the war he also was an officer in the British Military.
Answer: As others have noted, the “right to privacy” has virtually no Constitutional textual basis. The Justices in Griswold v Connecticut couldn’t even agree to which parts of the Constitution they could point to, and ended up saying it was some short of vague “penumbra of an emanation” of the Bill of Rights, but couldn’t explain what that meant or on what specific text it was based. The “right of privacy” was concocted out of thin air, in the shadows, by a SCOTUS coterie which wanted to protect people’s right to use contraceptives in their homes, but couldn't find any legitimate Constitutional basis to proclaim such a right. So they made it up. The right action by SCOTUS would have been to acknowledge that the Federal Government has no jurisdiction over contraception or abortion, those not being enumerated to the Federal Government by the Constitution and therefore denied to it by the 10th Amendment. SCOTUS should have sent the matter back to the States and directed all Federal Courts to but out. But it didn’t, leading to all the confusion and controversy that has ensued.
Explanation: