The sentence that suggests the narrator does not closely monitor Bar.tleby's performance after hiring him is given below.
<h3>What is the evidence that the lawyer didn't do thorough background checks on Bar.tleby?</h3>
The textual evidence is as follows;
"The Lawyer asks him: "What earthly right have you to stay here? Do you pay any rent? Do you pay any taxes? Or is this property yours?"
Bar.tleby makes no response, and the Lawyer becomes resigned to the idea that Bar.tleby will simply haunt his office, doing nothing.
The Lawyer believes he is doing a good, Christian thing by allowing Bar.tleby to continue existing in his office."
<h3>Who is Bar.tleby?</h3>
From the text "Bar.tleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street", Bar.tleby is an old scrivener at The Lawyer's office, Turkey. He is cheerful and productive until midday, when he gets dru.nk, grumpy, and basically worth.less.
We never discover his full name since The Lawyer only refers to him by his nickname. A twelve-year-old assistant in the legal office.
Learn more about narrator:
brainly.com/question/28223605
#SPJ1
Answer:
no, we cant say "could have HAVE been"
Explanation:
saying double have sounds weird and isn't the right way to talk.
Answer:
This is the part when he is on horseback, about to warn the town that the British are coming. In the first line, he starts heading toward the village streets with "the fate of a nation" counted on him to do so. This because he is about to warn everyone so that they can be prepared to fight. This is shown through the lines "the spark struck out by that steed", meaning that the villagers are counting on his warning to change history by sparking the Revolution.
i think c is correct answer
