The options of the question should be, A) Biased historical evidence. B) Poor historical evidence. C) Primary source document. D) Secondary source document. E) Biased primary source document.
The correct answer is C) Primary source document.
<em>The statement that actually describes a newspaper article written during a historical event is “primary source document.”
</em>
Primary sources are images, papers or documents that provided correct or formal evidence of the situation, person, incident of phenomena that is being researched. A primary source helps the historian or the writer to understand more clearly and specificaly the object of study in order to explain it. In his case, which describes a newspaper article written during a historical event is a primary source document to make it valid.
Answer: Aztecs built causeways and canals for transportation to and from the city. A causeway is a raised road that allowed the people to easily travel over the swampy and wet areas.
They were protesting against the catholic church and its beliefs.
<span />
The Austrian/Hungarians wanted that province for themselves. It was revealed that the The Slavs had their own agenda and wanted to stray from the pan-Slavic ambitions and this was seen as a rebellion. They also wanted to annex themselves from Austria/Hungary. To capture control, by either party, would upset the balance of power in Europe and defeat the purpose of a Dual Monarchy.
The answer should be true but it’s been a year so I might be wrong lol
