A local official wants to have a new highway built over a transform boundary. Why is this a bad idea?

Social Studies

2 answers:

docker41 [41]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

It is a place that is inclined to earthquakes.

Explanation:

Building a highway over a transform boundary is not recommendable, as it could be very dangerous. This area is very prone to earthquakes and it can destroy the highway. This is not only dangerous for the highway, it's very dangerous for people as it can cause death. The infrastructure would be demolished.

Mazyrski [523]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

This is a bad idea because there would be a lot of earthquakes there that could destroy the highway and harm the people that are driving on the highway in the process.

Explanation:

In a transform boundary, 2 plates are sliding together which can cause earthquakes. If someone was to build something under it, it would be completely destroyed because of the earthquakes.

You might be interested in

Examples about that show Sheikh Zayed's sense of social responsibility

umka2103 [35]

Answer:

“The Zayed Foundation aims to spread the culture of social responsibility and promote its practices within Emirati society to assist the vulnerable,” he added.

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

One result of the explorations sponsored by Portugal's Prince Henry the Navigator was that

soldier1979 [14.2K]

Explores found their way to North

5 0

3 years ago

Name two law officers that became famous while protecting dodge city

ankoles [38]

Wyatt Earp and Doc Holliday were the two officers made famous by the OK Corral shootout. When the Cowboys threatened their lives several times, the deputy officer Doc Holliday supported Wyatt Earp. The two officers participated in a 30 second shootout. All of the assailants who came against them got killed.

3 0

2 years ago

What hormone triggers hunger? glucose progesterone testosterone ghrelin

Tanzania [10]

Answer:

Ghrelin (I hope this helps!!)

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If a court makes a ruling based on a principle established in a previous ruling from another court, it is an example of

Korvikt [17]

Answer:

stare decisis

Explanation:

In law, stare decisis can be described as a situation in which historical cases are used for forming a rule when a similar case is seen. In this type of system, rules are formed in consideration of the previous rules which were acknowledged for a similar case. Stare decisis simply means to stand by what is already decided. The principle of stare decisis is the core of U.S common law. All court relies on U.S supreme court precedents.

7 0

3 years ago