1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hammer [34]
3 years ago
5

HELP!! PLEASE!! ASAP!!

History
1 answer:
Alinara [238K]3 years ago
6 0
B.siege of the Alamo
You might be interested in
NEED THIS ASAP!!
Alex_Xolod [135]

Answer:

C. Religious involvement increased

Explanation:

New religions placed importance on individual thought and action

4 0
3 years ago
A balanced economy generally has which economic stance?
Alekssandra [29.7K]
Neutral because it means balanced
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the enclosure movement and the two significant results it had during the Agricultural Revolution
horsena [70]
Enclosure is also considered one of the causes of the Agricultural Revolution. Enclosed land was under control of the farmer, who was free to adopt better farming practices. Following enclosure, crop yields and livestock output increased while at the same time productivity increased enough to create a surplus of labor.
8 0
3 years ago
What was the significance of the pope’s declaring Charlemagne emperor?
Lesechka [4]
I'm not sure if the emphasis is to be put on the fact that the <em>Pope</em> declared or that the event occurred. I'll answer both.

It was significant that the Pope declared it because he was pretty much the only person who had the ability to declare such a thing. Even though the kingdoms of Europe had different rulers, most kingdoms were based on the Catholic religion. Therefore, the Pope had influence. If he declared something, it was as good as God declaring it.

It was significant that a Holy Roman Emperor was declared because it was the first step -- of many -- to achieving German unification. Before Charlemagne, Germany was nothing more than the Germanic tribes. The Holy Roman Empire, which lasted until 1806, kept these kingdoms united.
5 0
3 years ago
which strategy would a historian most likely use to determine whether a source is valid? a. confirming that it is not an online
nekit [7.7K]

<u>"confirming that it is not an online source" </u>is wrong. The problem is not the fact the source is online, but if it's credible.

<u>"determining whether or not it is well-known" </u>well-known sources might still be wrong. Being known does not make something true.

<u>"d. determining whether it is a secondary source" </u>again, it has nothing at all to do with the validity of the source.

So the answer is:

b. checking its conclusions against other sources

The best way is to check the source and compare to different ones that talk about the same subject. Comparing different conclusions of different authors and seeing different points of view about the same thing is often the best way.



6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Use the drop-down menus to complete each statement.
    14·1 answer
  • HEY GUYS CAN YOU GUYS WRITE EVERYTHING YOU KNOW FROM THIS INFORMATION PLUS EVERYTHING YOU THINK THESE ARTIFACTS MEAN ABOUT THE C
    15·1 answer
  • In 1453, the Ottoman Empire rose to power by defeating the
    5·2 answers
  • Describe ww1 in 3 sentences
    6·2 answers
  • Describe the political ideals the colonists brought from England to North America.
    10·1 answer
  • What does this political cartoon suggest about how Germany achieved unification? Otto von Bismarck was a puppet of Wilhelm I and
    7·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE!! JUST MAKE QUESTIONS!!
    11·2 answers
  • Explain how to evaluate a writren source of information.
    5·1 answer
  • Is the verb past, present, or
    11·1 answer
  • Describe 2 key features of the catholic beliefs about the organisation of the church
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!