Answer:
Nowadays, given the changes in family and social structures that have overthrown the traditional family system (that is, the typical family whose spouses were married until the end have been moved to a society in which there are divorces, assembled families, single-parent families, etc.) have suppressed the figures of discipline and family hierarchy that, until that moment, were represented in the figures of the father and mother of the family, which were ultimately images similar to those of the State power structures (that is, it was educated from the teaching of respect for the hierarchy).
Today, with this disruption, many of these hierarchical representations have been lost, which has generated that many young people have begun to take attitudes of rebellion and indiscipline, motivated by the lack of a strong hierarchical and disciplinary role in their family environment.
Un poco mas que la anterior de la suma de la reputacion
Answer:
It is based on obligation, not on friendship.
Explanation:
Xenia is an ancient Greek belief/ concept of extending hospitality to others, especially strangers. It is this belief that will hold many respectable relationships in Greek culture and even still practiced by some people in the modern world.
In both the Greek culture and the book "The Odyssey" by Homer, the concept of Xenia is presented or practiced. The question is asking which is not true of this concept, so the <u>concept that is not true will be that Xenia is based on religious obligation and not friendship</u>. This is false because, <u>Xenia is based on both religious and friendship obligations, not just one alone</u>. Xenia allows people to be hospitable to one another which can continue for generations, thus, merging with the friendship obligation.
The<u> failure to show xenia can incur the wrath of Zeus is true for Zeus is believed to be the patron of the very concept</u>.
<u>Xenia involves the reciprocal guest-host relationship of hospitality is true because it is about the two parties' relationship of showing hospitality towards one another</u>, the host waiting for the guest to be comfortable before he can ask questions and the guest has to make sure they do nothing wrong against their host. They are also expected to show the same hospitality whenever needed in the future.
<u>Odysseus violated the code of xenia on the island when he was a guest of the Cyclops Polyphemus by stealing his property and hurting him</u>.
Answer: Dr. Naismith would have been surprised, if he had known how popular basketball would become.
Explanation:
The best way to combine these two sentences is to put a comma between them.
When joined together, these two sentences form a third conditional sentence.
In a third conditional sentence, one part of the sentence contains 'would have' + past participle <em>(would have been surprised)</em>, while the other part of the sentence contains 'if' and past perfect form of the verb (<em>if he had known</em>). Third conditional sentences are used to talk about impossible outcomes. Dr. Naismith was a physical educator who died in 1939. Therefore, the scenario of him witnessing the popularity of basketball is not possible.
It would be easier if you provided an excerpt. Anyway I think that the right answer is C.. She is not the fastest runner in the race..
