Post hoc states that one event led to the following event that came after it. Since event B came after event A, event A caused event B.
This is fallacy because there are things such as coincidences, and an event coming after one doesn't mean they have to be related in any way.
The correct answer is 4. No, because he digresses into another topic and does not address historical knowledge.
Explanation
At the beginning of the paragraph, the author announces the sentence "In no other department is a thorough knowledge of history so important as a philosophy". However, nowhere in the paragraph does he develop this idea, on the contrary, he mentions other issues such as the relationship between philosophy and other fields such as exact inqury, the arts (as he mentioned in "on the other hand, in touch with exact inquiry, while, on the other, it has a certain relationship with art"), natural sciences, metaphysical principles, among others. From the above, it can be inferred that the correct answer is 4. No, because he digresses into another topic and does not address historical knowledge.
i think the answer would be B
Answer: "with all the works",
"of the wise conduct",
"of life"
Explanation:
A prepositional phrase refers to a group of word that's made up of a preposition, the object, and the modifier. It mostly modifies either the noun or the verb.
The parts of the sentence that are prepositional phrases will be:
• with all the works",
• "of the wise conduct",
• "of life"