Answer:
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were arguably the two most important leaders during the American Civil Rights Movement. Although both were dedicated to ending racial discrimination towards African Americans and achieving racial freedom, the two appeared to differ significantly in their ideology and tactics.
Aims: Martin Luther King was an integrationist, whose main aim was to bring about racial equality through both races mixing and working together. However, Malcolm X was a black nationalist with a firm belief in black supremacy. Although he also wanted civil rights, he championed black superiority over whites and wanted the races to be distinctly separated, as he remained suspicious of white people and believed that African Americans should only seek to help one another.
Tactics: The issue of how to achieve their goals also differed. To achieve racial equality, Martin Luther King believed non-violent resistance was the key to ending all violence and racial hatred, in order to eventually achieve equality between races. These non-violent tactics were evident during peaceful protests such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott 1955. Malcolm X on the other hand, believed that non-violent methods were too slow to achieve progress and signified weakness. He strongly believed in black pride and that African Americans should achieve their goals “by any means necessary”, advocating black militancy both as a form of self-defence and defiance against white aggression.
Explanation:
“ The rebels promised to provide laborers to help the United States build Panama Canal. “
Answer: The anwser is true. they had special coffins for them when they died
Explanation:
The two developments that led to a state of emergency being formally declared in 1965 by the governor of Kenya were:
- Mau Mau attacks on individuals and settlements loyal to Britain.
- failure of a 1950 ban to stop the growth of the Mau Mau Rebellion.
<h3>Why did Kenya see a state of emergency in 1952?</h3>
As anti-colonial sentiment spread across Africa after World War II, Kenya was no different and the Mau Mau organization was one of those that pushed for independence in Kenya.
They went about it violently however by attacking individuals and settlements that were seen as pro-British and therefore had government protection.
This led to a ban in 1950 to stop the growth of the Mau Mau organization. This ban failed however, as the Mau Mau only grew in numbers and popularity.
In the end, the governor had to declare a state of emergency to deal with the Mau Mau Uprising.
Find out more on the Mau Mau rebellion at brainly.com/question/26522309
#SPJ1
Well think about it, Barnabas already parted from Paul. Paul didn't want to go with Mark. So that takes Paul completely off the list. So it was Barnabas and Mark who went.
