Answer:
It can be didactic or hortatory
Explanation: Didactic:This means that it sets out to teach, to instruct.
hortatory, meaning that it urges and encourages the addressee towards following a certain path, as the father aims to inculcate a whole set of morals and values in his son.
Adverbs are words that modify adjectives or verbs.
Many adverbs end in -ly, such as kindly, politely, softly, etc.
Yesterday can be either an adverb or a noun. In the way it's used here, it is an adverb.
Rachel is a name, so it is a noun, or proper noun to be precise.
worked is a verb, since it's an action. (to work)
slowly is an adverb, since it describes the verb, worked.
because is a conjunction.
she is a pronoun.
was is a verb.
so is an adverb, it describes the verb, was.
tired is an adjective.
So the answers to this question are Yesterday and so.
Hope this helps :)
Hello. You forgot to put the text to which the question refers, which makes it impossible for me to provide an exact answer. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
To answer this question it is necessary to read the entire text. The phrases that the author shows his opinion of Shakespeare's role in the future, will be the one in which the author shows an assumption about what he thinks will happen. These sentences are likely to be constructed using verbs in the future tense, so the author testifies that he is making an assumption, a projection, about what Shakespeare will represent.
Answer:
Goines's narrative essay is relevant to readers today because its pacifist (anti-war) message, even though inspired by the Vietnam war, is a universal humanist statement.
Explanation:
Admittedly, today's youth may not be very interested in the particularities of the Vietnam war. However, <u>they could very well relate to civil disobedience, social injustices, as well as the humorous and sarcastic tone that Goines employs when he recounts his resistance to the political establishment</u>. For example, Goines's witty account of tampering with the bureaucracy to delay his conscription for as long as it takes for them to lose his file could be very appealing to today's young rebels at heart. Today, when there are no drafts, young people could have a hard time trying to understand the political intricacies of the 1960s and early 1970s. Still, the urge to resist war, especially when it comes at a cost so great that even the young have to pay it, still exists. This chapter is also relevant because it could help the young reassess or even redefine their definition of patriotism: am I a greater patriot if I go to fight in a war on behalf of my country or if I resist its unreasonable foreign and domestic policies?
Possibly they wanted general freedoms?
