There are lot of legal cases. How the except relate to the premises of Brown v. Board of Education is that;
- The Brown case addresses whether these laws inherently deny certain citizens equal protection under the law.
<h3>Why was the Brown vs Board of Education vital?</h3>
The U.S. Supreme Court's made a decision in Brown v. Board of Education that is said to be a turning point in the history of race relations found in the United States.
Record shows that on May 17, 1954, the Court removed the constitutional sanctions for segregation by race, and also said that there is equal opportunity to all in education the law of the land.
Learn more about Brown v. Board of Education from
brainly.com/question/9857823
<span>The question is asking us why Indigenous peoples in the Americas had never eaten pork or beef before contact with European explorers. The answer is that
B. Cattle and pigs were found only in Europe - before, Americans ate big rodents for example, which were found on this continents, but pigs and cows were not originally living in America, so they could only be kept after they were brought from Europe.</span>
It did not establish judicial review. Judicial review had been used in state courts and lower federal courts prior to Marbury, and ruled a number of times that some laws were unconstitutional. In fact, even the Supreme Court used judicial review before Marbury to decide that a carriage tax was constitutional (Hylton v. United States).
However, Marbury was the first case that the Supreme Court used to rule a law unconstitutional. They declared that a part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 which gave the US Supreme Court court original jurisdiction over writs of mandamus. The Court ruled that Congress does not have the authority to modify the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction, therefore, it was unconstitutional.
<span>In a way, by doing so, the Supreme Court actually took away some of it's power that Congress had granted it because the Constitution did not grant Congress that power.</span>
I'd say so. The Articles of Confederation actually gave the states too much individual power to begin with, and that's why they revised it/changed it.
You just created a question that will probably get removed by admins.
